RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Life] >> Marriage



Message


keepingfaith -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/17/2008 10:38:28 PM)

quote:

And I have asked the before, but what if two unbelievers married, then divorced, and then married again and one or both came to Christ? Is that not forgiven?


Whether the divorce is forgiven or not- the first marriage still exists and is not dissolved by forgiveness... it is dissolved by death. 1cor7:39, Rom 7:2-3.

The same laws of marriage apply to unbelievers. There are scriptural examples of unbelievers marriages that God recognized... and we are even commanded to stay with an unbeliever if we are married to one, that they might be won over to the Lord by our example. So God clearly recognizes those marriages.




keepingfaith -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/17/2008 10:42:33 PM)

quote:

Nope, God is the arbitrator. We don't really know.


I don't believe God's Word is so ambiguous that we can't know the truth and I certainly don't believe He would leave us in the dark on a subject like this. If none of us can really know if we are in a valid marriage, that means many could really be fornicating and scripture says those fornicating will not inherit Heaven...so that's kind of scary.




huckfinn327 -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/18/2008 1:11:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrsTracy72

quote:

Marriage has been manifest when one (nerver been married or widowed) man, and one (never been married or widowed) woman consent to and complete a public wedding ceremony.



Still not convinced. My grandmother was not given a choice in who she married. While she never divorced, I do have friends I went to high school with who were already in arranged marriages. One of them had a boyfriend all through high school, but had to marry the person who her parents chose for her. There was a public ceremony, and she did say "I do" but she didn't want to and couldn't say no.

I don't see that as a marriage blessed by God. Just the same, I don't see God blessing a marriage where one had no intention in staying in that marriage from the beginning and lied about it. So yes, both went through that public ceremony, but if one of them lied about their intentions, then is that really a marriage? The bible doesn't cover that.


MrsTracy72: You "labor" to find some kind of exception. You might note that pre-arranged marriage was the rule in the Mid-East from ancient times and it still remains valid in many large countries like India. It is a very legitimate form of the public wedding. (By the way the divorce/remarriage rate in India is very low) making prearranged marriage a very successful form of marriage. In this case the bride and groom "willing" forfeit the right to make a personal choice but willing elect their parents to be their chosers. Rebekah was chosen for Isaac by his father Abraham. Isaac dearly loved Rebekah.

Gen 24:67 And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah's tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother's death.

You add the case of "fraud" to your list. Fraud is an illegal act and when proven makes the contract void. But keep in mind that Jacob was "defrauded" by Laban and married Leah instead of his choice, Rachel. But please note that God fully honored this fraudulent marriage ... Leah gave birth to both Judah and Levi. Jesus was the Lion of the Tribe of Judah. (Matt. 1: 1-16).

We are talking about the "Farmer" in our nursery rhyme: "The farmer takes a wife, the farmer takes a wife, hi-ho-the-dairy-O, the farmer takes a wife." Adam took Eve and she became his Wife.

Gen 2:25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.


All for His Glory ... Huckfinn




iwillfearnoevil -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/18/2008 9:13:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: keepingfaith
Whether the divorce is forgiven or not- the first marriage still exists and is not dissolved by forgiveness... it is dissolved by death.


again, totally incorrect. there are also cases such as sexual immorality and spouse leaving that dissolve the bond ... i realize you had no rebuttal for my two corrections of your "interpretations you made without leaving any facts" so it's just silly to keep asserting the same things [8D]




schupfNoodle -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/18/2008 5:32:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AbbyGrace

quote:

ORIGINAL: SealedEternal

quote:

ORIGINAL: AbbyGrace



Show me Scripture, where it says, "If you have divorced due to your spouse leaving you or abusing you, and you have remarried, and you both are serving the Lord, that you need to divorce, and ask God for reconcilation with the abusive spouse."

Show me Scripture for that.....you cant SE.


Because you're beginning with the false pretext that what God calls adultery is a legal marriage. By definition adultery is an extramarital relationship where a person is having relations with someone they are not married to. You don't therefore "divorce" from adultery, you repent of it.

SealedEternal


Ok, so what are you saying? They have gone through a divorce, due to abuse or that spouse leaving them, and later they remarry a person who is a Christian, and they are serving the Lord together.....so they are to repent for this? Is that what your saying? Correct me if Im wrong, but thats what I gather that you are saying.


Scripture has been provided by keepingfaith.

1 Cor 7:10
10But to the married I give instructions, (J)not I, but the Lord, that the wife should not leave her husband

11(but if she does leave, she must remain unmarried, or else be reconciled to her husband), and that the husband should not divorce his wife.


It means:
If the wife is separated from the abusive husband , she still has to remain unmarried. That means not marrying another, even though she's met a loving Christian guy.


Everyone knows we're not supposed to steal. But hey, I was not a Christian then and I stole my neighbor's car. When I turned to Christ ,I started using the car for missionary work and using the stolen car to serve the Lord. Becasue of it dozens have turned to Christ. Am I supposed to repent for the car now?




huckfinn327 -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/18/2008 8:17:57 PM)

quote:

(Original SchupfNoodle) Everyone knows we're not supposed to steal. But hey, I was not a Christian then and I stole my neighbor's car. When I turned to Christ ,I started using the car for missionary work and using the stolen car to serve the Lord. Becasue of it dozens have turned to Christ. Am I supposed to repent for the car now?



Luk 19:8 And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord; Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold.




keepingfaith -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/18/2008 8:20:01 PM)

quote:

again, totally incorrect. there are also cases such as sexual immorality and spouse leaving that dissolve the bond ... i realize you had no rebuttal for my two corrections of your "interpretations you made without leaving any facts" so it's just silly to keep asserting the same things


You must be using selective reading... because Sealed just addressed the 2 words "bound" and "not under bondage." And I also gave plenty of scriptural proof that your interpretation of that verse cannot be valid.

Why don't you provide an explanation as to why the "unbeliever leaving" exception didn't work for the man in Malachi 2:13-16 who treacherously divorced his wife? Not to mention it didn't work for her... she is STILL REFERRED TO AS HIS WIFE by covenant after divorce. And apparently he was an unbeliever ("not one has done so who has a remnant of the Spirit").

Jesus was speaking directly to unbelievers (the Pharisees) when He said "EVERYONE who divorces and marries another commits adultery."

Jesus Himself refutes the "unbeliever leaving" exception. I hope you are prepared with a dictionary in hand that gives a different definition for the word "EVERYONE", when you break the news to Jesus that He didn't know what He was talking about.

Luke 16:18
"EVERYONE who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries one who is divorced from a husband commits adultery."

Could you also point to where Paul noted the exception for sexual immorality or did neither of them know what they were talking about? There is a pretty big difference between "a woman is bound to her husband as long as he lives...and "a woman is bound to her husband as long as he is not sexually immoral."

God's Word does not contradict itself, so any interpretation that forces it to contradict cannot be correct and is not drawn using valid hermeneutics. If God's Word does contradict itself, we don't stand a chance at figuring out the truth.




iwillfearnoevil -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/19/2008 3:07:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: keepingfaith
You must be using selective reading... because Sealed just addressed the 2 words "bound" and "not under bondage." And I also gave plenty of scriptural proof that your interpretation of that verse cannot be valid.

you chose to reply to another part of my post ignoring that one. sealed did reply but you still can't get deny the words come from the same base word. ummm malachi 2 is addressing priests and not a specific man but reinforces the principle Paul taught that believers shouldn't be the ones leaving.

quote:

God's Word does not contradict itself, so any interpretation that forces it to contradict cannot be correct and is not drawn using valid hermeneutics. If God's Word does contradict itself, we don't stand a chance at figuring out the truth.


at this point you are being very selective in the scripture you are referring to. the Bible is made up of 66 books and one has study and pull things from all of them together. just as if one was studying something else. so when one scripture adds a condition (sexual immorality) and another does as well (unbelieving spouse leaving), you just can't not paste that down and pretend it doesn't exist. or claim it means something totally different when the words share the same base word. using your logic, you want one verse only from genesis that combines every single scripture on divorce/remarriage into one, and that's just not going to happen. if it was as easy as two becoming one, then there would not need to be any further discussion.




SealedEternal -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/19/2008 8:39:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: iwillfearnoevil

sealed did reply but you still can't get deny the words come from the same base word.


I can and do deny that because that is false. The words are actually unrelated. "Douloō" mean to enslave, to be made a servant of, or being under servitude. "Deō" means to bind, fasten with chains, put under obligation of the law, or to be bound to a husband or wife. They are not from the same root, and very distinct in their meanings. Beyond that, the contexts are completely different because verse 39 is absolutely referring to the marriage bond, while verse 15 only says it is referring to living arrangements.

SealedEternal




SealedEternal -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/19/2008 9:18:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: iwillfearnoevil

ummm malachi 2 is addressing priests and not a specific man but reinforces the principle Paul taught that believers shouldn't be the ones leaving.


The beginning of Malachi 2 starts out reproofing priests; but what makes you think that verses 13-17 are addressed to priests only? After the statements to the priests there is a rebuke to the Israelites in general, and then the passage we are discussing comes up, so there is no reason to assume it was referring to priests. Even if it was, why are their divorces not freeing them from their marriage covenants, and if theirs don't; why assume that others do?

SealedEternal




SealedEternal -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/19/2008 9:38:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: iwillfearnoevil

at this point you are being very selective in the scripture you are referring to. the Bible is made up of 66 books and one has study and pull things from all of them together.


Exactly my point. You're interpretations of a couple of verses directly contradict the countless ones I've been posting. Beyond that, your misinterpretation of one verse directly contradicts your misinterpretation of the other. Jesus said there is one exception only, yet you claim Paul had another that wasn't what He said was that only one. Beyond that, Jesus specifically said that a man who abandons his wife makes her commit adultery, while you claim Paul said it frees her from her marriage. So you not only contradict all of the verses on the topic, but contradict yourself as well.

Jesus specifically said in two of the three gospels that "EVERYONE" who divorces and remarries commits adultery, which you deny. Paul taught that it was adultery as well. Yet you take one verse where Jesus specifically said He was referring to a specific Old Covenant Law and misapply it to New Covenant people and cause Jesus to seemingly contradict His own teaching, and give one that is self refuting because adultery is both the sin one commits in divorce and remarriage and the allowance to do so according to you. Then you take a situation where Paul said that a believer is not under servitude to an unbeliever who refuses to dwell with him or her, but is bound to them for as long as they both shall live, and must remain unmarried or else reconcile with them, and claim it is allowing divorce and remarriage which it never states. And as I said earlier, your own loopholes contradict each other as well as the vast majority of the Bible on the subject.


SealedEternal




iwillfearnoevil -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/20/2008 9:40:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SealedEternal
Yet you take one verse where Jesus specifically said He was referring to a specific Old Covenant Law

You're interpretations ... your own loopholes


i already posted on that subject, it seems you are selectively reading my posts ... and you can say "my interpretations" when they are the majority opinion today and the anti-remarriage opinion is a small fringe movement with other erraneous beliefs based on other fallacies such as women not wearing sneakers and shirts and that we should not celebrate Christmas. see http://sealedeternal.bravehost.com/1.html for a whole list of crazy interpretations.




AbbyGrace -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/22/2008 4:43:54 PM)

I have to ask a question, if a man has divorced his wife, and not for adultery, but just for other reasons, should the wife remain faithful, and continue to pray for God to restore their marriage, even though he has divorced her?

And what about, the husband is the high priest of the home, and he divorced her, it was his choice and not hers, should she still pray for God to bring them back together, to restore them and for them to remarry?

I have already read all the verses, so dont post all of them, I just need a yes or no, and why.

Yes some verses, but not a page full of them SE, please? And has anyone been faced with this situation, and what was the out come of it?.

Thanks,
Abby




Roberta_ -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/22/2008 5:22:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AbbyGrace

I have to ask a question, if a man has divorced his wife, and not for adultery, but just for other reasons, should the wife remain faithful, and continue to pray for God to restore their marriage, even though he has divorced her?

And what about, the husband is the high priest of the home, and he divorced her, it was his choice and not hers, should she still pray for God to bring them back together, to restore them and for them to remarry?

I have already read all the verses, so dont post all of them, I just need a yes or no, and why.


Why would we not pray for people to return to (or start living) Godly lives and have their marriages restored?

quote:

And has anyone been faced with this situation, and what was the out come of it?.

Thanks,
Abby


I can't get into that without discussing my own personal situation. Sorry.




benelchi -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/22/2008 6:20:04 PM)

quote:


Scripture has been provided by keepingfaith.

1 Cor 7:10
10But to the married I give instructions, (J)not I, but the Lord, that the wife should not leave her husband

11(but if she does leave, she must remain unmarried, or else be reconciled to her husband), and that the husband should not divorce his wife.


It means:
If the wife is separated from the abusive husband , she still has to remain unmarried. That means not marrying another, even though she's met a loving Christian guy.


Everyone knows we're not supposed to steal. But hey, I was not a Christian then and I stole my neighbor's car. When I turned to Christ ,I started using the car for missionary work and using the stolen car to serve the Lord. Becasue of it dozens have turned to Christ. Am I supposed to repent for the car now?


The problem with your analogy is that Duet. 24:1-4 specifically addresses this situation, and teaches exactly the opposite of what you, SE, and keepingfaith are teaching.




SealedEternal -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/22/2008 10:11:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: benelchi

quote:


Scripture has been provided by keepingfaith.

1 Cor 7:10
10But to the married I give instructions, (J)not I, but the Lord, that the wife should not leave her husband

11(but if she does leave, she must remain unmarried, or else be reconciled to her husband), and that the husband should not divorce his wife.


It means:
If the wife is separated from the abusive husband , she still has to remain unmarried. That means not marrying another, even though she's met a loving Christian guy.


Everyone knows we're not supposed to steal. But hey, I was not a Christian then and I stole my neighbor's car. When I turned to Christ ,I started using the car for missionary work and using the stolen car to serve the Lord. Becasue of it dozens have turned to Christ. Am I supposed to repent for the car now?


The problem with your analogy is that Duet. 24:1-4 specifically addresses this situation, and teaches exactly the opposite of what you, SE, and keepingfaith are teaching.


The problem with your reasoning is that it contains several inherent flaws. First of all you are assuming that New Covenant believers are under the Old Covenant Laws, yet neither you nor I are adhering to them. So why are we bound to this one particular Law yet free to not adhere to all of them? The answer is that we don't divorce and stone people anymore because true children of God have had the Spirit of the Law of love written on our hearts and minds and aren't therefore bound to the letter given to hard hearted unregenerate Israelites.

Romans 7:1-6 Or do you not know, brethren (for I am speaking to those who know the law), that the law has jurisdiction over a person as long as he lives? For the married woman is bound by law to her husband while he is living; but if her husband dies, she is released from the law concerning the husband. So then, if while her husband is living she is joined to another man, she shall be called an adulteress; but if her husband dies, she is free from the law, so that she is not an adulteress though she is joined to another man. Therefore, my brethren, you also were made to die to the Law through the body of Christ, so that you might be joined to another, to Him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God. For while we were in the flesh, the sinful passions, which were aroused by the Law, were at work in the members of our body to bear fruit for death. But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter.


Secondly, Deuteronomy 24 only permitted Old Covenant men to divorce their wives for a particular cause, which according to the text was he found her sexually unclean (fornication) when he married her. Those men were forbidden from taking them back if they married again. On the other hand Jesus said that these Old Covenant men who divorcd for reasons other than "fornication" were committing adultery to remarry, and making their wives commit adultery, which by definition meant that their divorces did not separate the marriage bond and their subsequent marriages were extramarital affairs. Obviously these men and women weren't forbidden from ending the adulterous relationships and returning to their true marriages, and the Law you appeal to never said they shouldn't.

Deuteronomy 24:1 "When a man takes a wife and marries her, and it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out from his house"

Matthew 19:3-9 Some Pharisees came to Jesus, testing Him and asking, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?" And He answered and said, "Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, and said, 'FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH'? "So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate." They *said to Him, "Why then did Moses command to GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY?" He *said to them, "Because of your hardness of heart Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way. "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for fornication, and marries another woman commits adultery." (TR)And the one who marries her who was put away commits adultery.

Matthew 5:31-32 "It was said, 'WHOEVER SENDS HIS WIFE AWAY, LET HIM GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE'; but I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for the reason of unchastity, makes her commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

This was a condemnation against the Old Covenant people who were not following the allowable cause in Deuteronomy 24, which made their divorces invalid and subsequent relationships adulterous. You must therefore properly distinguish between what God calls lawful divorces for Old Covenant people, and what He calls unlawful divorces that didn't dissolve the marriage bond but rather led to adulterous relationships. Obviously God would not forbid people from leaving relationships that He calls unlawful and returning to their lawful spouse.

Thirdly, Jesus said to His disciples afterward that all New Covenant people who divorce and remarry were committing adultery, so obviously none of them should be forbidden from ending their extramarital affairs and returning to their true spouses:

Mark 10: 6-12 "But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. "FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh. "What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate." In the house the disciples began questioning Him about this again. And He *said to them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery."

Matthew 19:10-12 His disciples said to Him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry. But He said to them, Not all make room for this Word, but those to whom it is given. For there are eunuchs who were born thus from their mother's womb, and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who made eunuchs of themselves for the sake of the kingdom of Heaven. He who is able to receive, let him receive it.

The whole issue of Deuteronomy 24 is irrelevent to New Covenant people because we aren't under the Old Covenant, and beyond that Jesus said there is no exceptions for us, so for that reason also it doesn't apply. Adulterous relationships by definition are not legal marriages but rather sin, and therefore He is telling us that divorce cannot separate the marriage bond. Since according to Him our original marriage was never dissolved and the subsequent one was never a legitimate marriage, there is no restriction about returning to our true spouse and ending the extramarital affair, and thus His commandment to remain unmarried or else reconcile with our wayward spouse is not a false statement as you're trying to claim.

SealedEternal




SealedEternal -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/22/2008 10:42:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: schupfNoodle

quote:

ORIGINAL: AbbyGrace

quote:

ORIGINAL: SealedEternal

quote:

ORIGINAL: AbbyGrace



Show me Scripture, where it says, "If you have divorced due to your spouse leaving you or abusing you, and you have remarried, and you both are serving the Lord, that you need to divorce, and ask God for reconcilation with the abusive spouse."

Show me Scripture for that.....you cant SE.


Because you're beginning with the false pretext that what God calls adultery is a legal marriage. By definition adultery is an extramarital relationship where a person is having relations with someone they are not married to. You don't therefore "divorce" from adultery, you repent of it.

SealedEternal


Ok, so what are you saying? They have gone through a divorce, due to abuse or that spouse leaving them, and later they remarry a person who is a Christian, and they are serving the Lord together.....so they are to repent for this? Is that what your saying? Correct me if Im wrong, but thats what I gather that you are saying.


Scripture has been provided by keepingfaith.

1 Cor 7:10
10But to the married I give instructions, (J)not I, but the Lord, that the wife should not leave her husband

11(but if she does leave, she must remain unmarried, or else be reconciled to her husband), and that the husband should not divorce his wife.


It means:
If the wife is separated from the abusive husband , she still has to remain unmarried. That means not marrying another, even though she's met a loving Christian guy.


Everyone knows we're not supposed to steal. But hey, I was not a Christian then and I stole my neighbor's car. When I turned to Christ ,I started using the car for missionary work and using the stolen car to serve the Lord. Becasue of it dozens have turned to Christ. Am I supposed to repent for the car now?


That's an excellent analogy, and ultimately most people who try to justify divorce and remarriage will make that fallacious argument. That even though God said doing so is immoral; since it all seemingly ended up for the better it's ok and God will bless it. Sin is always sin and rebelling against God is never a good thing regardless of whether we think we know better and can bring about good by continuing in it.

Let's assume that this person you used in your analogy is leading people to Christ using His stolen car. Then one day the police realize the car is stolen and arrest this man in front of all of these people he is ministering to. That could undermine everything he taught them because his actions speak louder than his words. Or he doesn't get caught, but the people somehow find out the truth about his car. Either they are going to assume that Christ is not necessarily opposed to theft, or they will conclude that He has no power to truly transform lives. Either way this man ends up slandering His name and undermining the entire gospel message.

SealedEternal




benelchi -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/22/2008 10:50:54 PM)

You have tried these same old arguments before and they still have more holes than Swiss cheese.


quote:

ORIGINAL: SealedEternal

quote:

ORIGINAL: benelchi

quote:


Scripture has been provided by keepingfaith.

1 Cor 7:10
10But to the married I give instructions, (J)not I, but the Lord, that the wife should not leave her husband

11(but if she does leave, she must remain unmarried, or else be reconciled to her husband), and that the husband should not divorce his wife.


It means:
If the wife is separated from the abusive husband , she still has to remain unmarried. That means not marrying another, even though she's met a loving Christian guy.


Everyone knows we're not supposed to steal. But hey, I was not a Christian then and I stole my neighbor's car. When I turned to Christ ,I started using the car for missionary work and using the stolen car to serve the Lord. Becasue of it dozens have turned to Christ. Am I supposed to repent for the car now?


The problem with your analogy is that Duet. 24:1-4 specifically addresses this situation, and teaches exactly the opposite of what you, SE, and keepingfaith are teaching.


The problem with your reasoning is that it contains several inherent flaws. First of all you are assuming that New Covenant believers are under the Old Covenant Laws, yet neither you nor I are adhering to them. So why are we bound to this one particular Law yet free to not adhere to all of them? The answer is that we don't divorce and stone people anymore because true children of God have had the Spirit of the Law of love written on our hearts and minds and aren't therefore bound to the letter given to hard hearted unregenerate Israelites.

Romans 7:1-6 Or do you not know, brethren (for I am speaking to those who know the law), that the law has jurisdiction over a person as long as he lives? For the married woman is bound by law to her husband while he is living; but if her husband dies, she is released from the law concerning the husband. So then, if while her husband is living she is joined to another man, she shall be called an adulteress; but if her husband dies, she is free from the law, so that she is not an adulteress though she is joined to another man. Therefore, my brethren, you also were made to die to the Law through the body of Christ, so that you might be joined to another, to Him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God. For while we were in the flesh, the sinful passions, which were aroused by the Law, were at work in the members of our body to bear fruit for death. But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter.


Secondly, Deuteronomy 24 only permitted Old Covenant men to divorce their wives for a particular cause, which according to the text was he found her sexually unclean (fornication) when he married her. Those men were forbidden from taking them back if they married again. On the other hand Jesus said that these Old Covenant men who divorcd for reasons other than "fornication" were committing adultery to remarry, and making their wives commit adultery, which by definition meant that their divorces did not separate the marriage bond and their subsequent marriages were extramarital affairs. Obviously these men and women weren't forbidden from ending the adulterous relationships and returning to their true marriages, and the Law you appeal to never said they shouldn't.

Deuteronomy 24:1 "When a man takes a wife and marries her, and it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out from his house"

Matthew 19:3-9 Some Pharisees came to Jesus, testing Him and asking, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?" And He answered and said, "Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, and said, 'FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH'? "So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate." They *said to Him, "Why then did Moses command to GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY?" He *said to them, "Because of your hardness of heart Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way. "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for fornication, and marries another woman commits adultery." (TR)And the one who marries her who was put away commits adultery.

Matthew 5:31-32 "It was said, 'WHOEVER SENDS HIS WIFE AWAY, LET HIM GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE'; but I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for the reason of unchastity, makes her commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

This was a condemnation against the Old Covenant people who were not following the allowable cause in Deuteronomy 24, which made their divorces invalid and subsequent relationships adulterous. You must therefore properly distinguish between what God calls lawful divorces for Old Covenant people, and what He calls unlawful divorces that didn't dissolve the marriage bond but rather led to adulterous relationships. Obviously God would not forbid people from leaving relationships that He calls unlawful and returning to their lawful spouse.

Thirdly, Jesus said to His disciples afterward that all New Covenant people who divorce and remarry were committing adultery, so obviously none of them should be forbidden from ending their extramarital affairs and returning to their true spouses:

Mark 10: 6-12 "But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. "FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh. "What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate." In the house the disciples began questioning Him about this again. And He *said to them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery."

Matthew 19:10-12 His disciples said to Him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry. But He said to them, Not all make room for this Word, but those to whom it is given. For there are eunuchs who were born thus from their mother's womb, and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who made eunuchs of themselves for the sake of the kingdom of Heaven. He who is able to receive, let him receive it.

The whole issue of Deuteronomy 24 is irrelevent to New Covenant people because we aren't under the Old Covenant, and beyond that Jesus said there is no exceptions for us, so for that reason also it doesn't apply. Adulterous relationships by definition are not legal marriages but rather sin, and therefore He is telling us that divorce cannot separate the marriage bond. Since according to Him our original marriage was never dissolved and the subsequent one was never a legitimate marriage, there is no restriction about returning to our true spouse and ending the extramarital affair, and thus His commandment to remain unmarried or else reconcile with our wayward spouse is not a false statement as you're trying to claim.

SealedEternal




SealedEternal -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/22/2008 11:44:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: benelchi

You have tried these same old arguments before and they still have more holes than Swiss cheese.


And you've responded with unsubstantiated platitudes before, but they don't prove anything.

SealedEternal




AbbyGrace -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/23/2008 2:39:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SealedEternal

quote:

ORIGINAL: benelchi

quote:


Scripture has been provided by keepingfaith.

1 Cor 7:10
10But to the married I give instructions, (J)not I, but the Lord, that the wife should not leave her husband

11(but if she does leave, she must remain unmarried, or else be reconciled to her husband), and that the husband should not divorce his wife.


It means:
If the wife is separated from the abusive husband , she still has to remain unmarried. That means not marrying another, even though she's met a loving Christian guy.


Everyone knows we're not supposed to steal. But hey, I was not a Christian then and I stole my neighbor's car. When I turned to Christ ,I started using the car for missionary work and using the stolen car to serve the Lord. Becasue of it dozens have turned to Christ. Am I supposed to repent for the car now?


The problem with your analogy is that Duet. 24:1-4 specifically addresses this situation, and teaches exactly the opposite of what you, SE, and keepingfaith are teaching.


The problem with your reasoning is that it contains several inherent flaws. First of all you are assuming that New Covenant believers are under the Old Covenant Laws, yet neither you nor I are adhering to them. So why are we bound to this one particular Law yet free to not adhere to all of them? The answer is that we don't divorce and stone people anymore because true children of God have had the Spirit of the Law of love written on our hearts and minds and aren't therefore bound to the letter given to hard hearted unregenerate Israelites.

Romans 7:1-6 Or do you not know, brethren (for I am speaking to those who know the law), that the law has jurisdiction over a person as long as he lives? For the married woman is bound by law to her husband while he is living; but if her husband dies, she is released from the law concerning the husband. So then, if while her husband is living she is joined to another man, she shall be called an adulteress; but if her husband dies, she is free from the law, so that she is not an adulteress though she is joined to another man. Therefore, my brethren, you also were made to die to the Law through the body of Christ, so that you might be joined to another, to Him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God. For while we were in the flesh, the sinful passions, which were aroused by the Law, were at work in the members of our body to bear fruit for death. But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter.


Secondly, Deuteronomy 24 only permitted Old Covenant men to divorce their wives for a particular cause, which according to the text was he found her sexually unclean (fornication) when he married her. Those men were forbidden from taking them back if they married again. On the other hand Jesus said that these Old Covenant men who divorcd for reasons other than "fornication" were committing adultery to remarry, and making their wives commit adultery, which by definition meant that their divorces did not separate the marriage bond and their subsequent marriages were extramarital affairs. Obviously these men and women weren't forbidden from ending the adulterous relationships and returning to their true marriages, and the Law you appeal to never said they shouldn't.

Deuteronomy 24:1 "When a man takes a wife and marries her, and it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out from his house"

Matthew 19:3-9 Some Pharisees came to Jesus, testing Him and asking, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?" And He answered and said, "Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, and said, 'FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH'? "So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate." They *said to Him, "Why then did Moses command to GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY?" He *said to them, "Because of your hardness of heart Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way. "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for fornication, and marries another woman commits adultery." (TR)And the one who marries her who was put away commits adultery.

Matthew 5:31-32 "It was said, 'WHOEVER SENDS HIS WIFE AWAY, LET HIM GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE'; but I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for the reason of unchastity, makes her commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

This was a condemnation against the Old Covenant people who were not following the allowable cause in Deuteronomy 24, which made their divorces invalid and subsequent relationships adulterous. You must therefore properly distinguish between what God calls lawful divorces for Old Covenant people, and what He calls unlawful divorces that didn't dissolve the marriage bond but rather led to adulterous relationships. Obviously God would not forbid people from leaving relationships that He calls unlawful and returning to their lawful spouse.

Thirdly, Jesus said to His disciples afterward that all New Covenant people who divorce and remarry were committing adultery, so obviously none of them should be forbidden from ending their extramarital affairs and returning to their true spouses:

Mark 10: 6-12 "But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. "FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh. "What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate." In the house the disciples began questioning Him about this again. And He *said to them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery."

Matthew 19:10-12 His disciples said to Him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry. But He said to them, Not all make room for this Word, but those to whom it is given. For there are eunuchs who were born thus from their mother's womb, and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who made eunuchs of themselves for the sake of the kingdom of Heaven. He who is able to receive, let him receive it.

The whole issue of Deuteronomy 24 is irrelevent to New Covenant people because we aren't under the Old Covenant, and beyond that Jesus said there is no exceptions for us, so for that reason also it doesn't apply. Adulterous relationships by definition are not legal marriages but rather sin, and therefore He is telling us that divorce cannot separate the marriage bond. Since according to Him our original marriage was never dissolved and the subsequent one was never a legitimate marriage, there is no restriction about returning to our true spouse and ending the extramarital affair, and thus His commandment to remain unmarried or else reconcile with our wayward spouse is not a false statement as you're trying to claim.

SealedEternal


Can you please do something? You continue to post these verses over and over, but if someone knew comes to this thread, and they read this, that person may not have complete understanding of what the Bible is saying....so can you please, take one verse at a time, and give interpretation of it, to help us understand? Posting the same thing over and over, just isnt getting it, you can go back pages and see this yourself. And its not that people arent wanting to understand, but its that people are being faced with the situation, and they are truly looking for the answer in God's Word....you seem to know it, but interpretation of each verse would help. Thank you.




SealedEternal -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/23/2008 3:57:40 PM)

Genesis 2:21 So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh at that place. The LORD God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought her to the man. The man said, "This is now bone of my bones, And flesh of my flesh; She shall be called Woman, Because she was taken out of Man." For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh.

God created marriage in the garden of Eden, and stated that this union would take these two from their families and join the two into one flesh to create a new family unit. Jesus quoted this to the Pharisees when asked about divorce, and added that we could not separate this union because it is joined by God:

Matthew 19:3-6 Some Pharisees came to Jesus, testing Him and asking, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?" And He answered and said, "Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, and said, 'FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH'? "So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate."

Mark 10:6-9 "But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. "FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh. "What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate."

Paul also quoted the creation of marriage in Genesis in his teaching on the topic:

Ephesians 5:22-33 Wives, be subject to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is the head of the church, He Himself being the Savior of the body. But as the church is subject to Christ, so also the wives ought to be to their husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself up for her, so that He might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, that He might present to Himself the church in all her glory, having no spot or wrinkle or any such thing; but that she would be holy and blameless. So husbands ought also to love their own wives as their own bodies. He who loves his own wife loves himself; for no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ also does the church, because we are members of His body. FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND SHALL BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH. This mystery is great; but I am speaking with reference to Christ and the church. Nevertheless, each individual among you also is to love his own wife even as himself, and the wife must see to it that she respects her husband.

Marriage symbolically represents Christ's people being joined to and becoming one with Him:

John 17:20-23 "I do not ask on behalf of these alone, but for those also who believe in Me through their word; that they may all be one; even as You, Father, are in Me and I in You, that they also may be in Us, so that the world may believe that You sent Me. "The glory which You have given Me I have given to them, that they may be one, just as We are one; I in them and You in Me, that they may be perfected in unity, so that the world may know that You sent Me, and loved them, even as You have loved Me."

Marriage is a perminent covenant that is unconditional once it is accepted by both parties involved, just as the New Covenant that Christ made with His Church. He is always loyal to His end of the covenant He made with us, and we can know that He will fulfill his obligations despite our flaws. So also we enter into an unconditional covenant which requires us to exhibit the same grace, forgiveness, and unconditional love that He demonstrated to us, and that we therefore may only be released from these obligations through the death of our partner:

Romans 7:2-3 For the married woman is bound by law to her husband while he is living; but if her husband dies, she is released from the law concerning the husband. So then, if while her husband is living she is joined to another man, she shall be called an adulteress; but if her husband dies, she is free from the law, so that she is not an adulteress though she is joined to another man.

1 Corinthians 7:39 A wife is bound as long as her husband lives; but if her husband is dead, she is free to be married to whom she wishes, only in the Lord.

If only death will dissolve this covenant which God has joined together, then any woman joining to another man while her husband lives is committing adultery according to Paul in Romans 7. This is a reiteration of what Jesus taught while He walked the earth:

Mark 10:10-12 In the house the disciples began questioning Him about this again. And He *said to them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery."

Luke 16:18 "Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries one who is divorced from a husband commits adultery.”

He also condemned the Old Covenant people for their misuse of the Laws of Moses to divorce and remarry, which He said was causing them to commit adultery since their illegal divorces did not separate their marriage covenants:

Matthew 5:31-32 "It was said, 'WHOEVER SENDS HIS WIFE AWAY, LET HIM GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE'; but I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for the reason of unchastity, makes her commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Matthew 19:7-9 They *said to Him, "Why then did Moses command to GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY?" He *said to them, "Because of your hardness of heart Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way. "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for fornication, and marries another woman commits adultery. (TR) And the one who marries her who was put away commits adultery.

The Old Covenant Israelites did have one provision for divorce which Jesus said was fornication, but He added that men who divorced for reasons other than finding their wives had fornicated prior to marriage were committing adultery, making their wives commit adultery, and causing whoever married her afterward to commit adultery. Therefore this was a condemnation of the men of Israel who were divorcing and remarrying apart from this very limited provision in the Law, and telling them that they were adulterers for doing so and thus should have been stoned to death according to Old Covenant Law.

This is the Law He was refering to:

Deuteronomy 22:13-19 "If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and then turns against her, and charges her with shameful deeds and publicly defames her, and says, 'I took this woman, but when I came near her, I did not find her a virgin,' then the girl's father and her mother shall take and bring out the evidence of the girl's virginity to the elders of the city at the gate. "The girl's father shall say to the elders, 'I gave my daughter to this man for a wife, but he turned against her; and behold, he has charged her with shameful deeds, saying, "I did not find your daughter a virgin." But this is the evidence of my daughter's virginity.' And they shall spread the garment before the elders of the city. "So the elders of that city shall take the man and chastise him, and they shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give it to the girl's father, because he publicly defamed a virgin of Israel. And she shall remain his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days.

Deuteronomy 24:1-4 "When a man takes a wife and marries her, and it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out from his house, and she leaves his house and goes and becomes another man's wife, and if the latter husband turns against her and writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out of his house, or if the latter husband dies who took her to be his wife, then her former husband who sent her away is not allowed to take her again to be his wife, since she has been defiled; for that is an abomination before the LORD, and you shall not bring sin on the land which the LORD your God gives you as an inheritance.

So for Old Covenant men there was a provision to divorce a woman who was found not to be a virgin when he married her, but also says that if she was a virgin at that time, that "he cannot divorce her all his days." That's why Jesus said that these men who divorced for reasons other than fornication were committing adultery, making their wives commit adultery, and causing whoever married her afterward to commit adultery.

This Old Covenant provision has no application to New Covenant people who don't live according to the Laws of Moses, so it is irrelevent to this discussion. Beyond that, it was a condemnation against the Old Covenant people and calling them adulterers for their divorces and remarriages, yet divorce and remarriage advocates try to turn it upside down and claim it is giving permission to do excactly what it was condemning.

Therefore we are commanded not to divorce to begin with, and commanded that if separation does occur that we must either remain unmarried, or else be reconciled to our spouse:

1 Corinthians 7: 10-13 But to the married I give instructions, not I, but the Lord, that the wife should not leave her husband (but if she does leave, she must remain unmarried, or else be reconciled to her husband), and that the husband should not divorce his wife. But to the rest I say, not the Lord, that if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he must not divorce her. And a woman who has an unbelieving husband, and he consents to live with her, she must not send her husband away.

Those who do not adhere to this commandment are entering into extramarital affairs according to both Jesus and Paul.

SealedEternal




benelchi -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/23/2008 6:43:36 PM)

quote:


Deuteronomy 24:1-4 "When a man takes a wife and marries her, and it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out from his house, and she leaves his house and goes and becomes another man's wife, and if the latter husband turns against her and writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out of his house, or if the latter husband dies who took her to be his wife, then her former husband who sent her away is not allowed to take her again to be his wife, since she has been defiled; for that is an abomination before the LORD, and you shall not bring sin on the land which the LORD your God gives you as an inheritance.

So for Old Covenant men there was a provision to divorce a woman who was found not to be a virgin when he married her, but also says that if she was a virgin at that time, that "he cannot divorce her all his days." That's why Jesus said that these men who divorced for reasons other than fornication were committing adultery, making their wives commit adultery, and causing whoever married her afterward to commit adultery.



And this represents one of the biggest scriptural problems with SE interpretation.

1) This is not a natural understanding of the language of this passage. You have to really twist was written to come to this conclusion.

2) We have zero evidence from history that the Jewish people or the Early Christian church ever understood this verse as Sealed as presented. And it is a passage that is commented on quite often because different schools within Judaism interpreted this passage differently and they debated the differences quite often; however, none presented the view to which Sealed has.

3) This is not the natural understanding of Jesus' comments about this passage. You have to really twist Jesus words to come to this conclusion. Again not even the early church interpreted these verses the way SE does. While the early church did interpret these verses as excluding remarriage, the idea of adultery in betrothal never entered the discussion.

Because these verses were so heavily discussed by early Judaism and early Christianity we do have a good idea what they understood about these passages. Before anyone should accept the interpretation SE has offered, he should explain why no early reference to this verse ever comes to the same conclusion he has presented. They simply did not understand these verses as he has presented them.

If you look through the history of this thread, you will find that he has simply made "facts" up to support his interpretation this verse, but he has never been able to find any scholarly support for the fallacious claims he has made.

If we abandon the linguistic gymnastics employed by SE to get around the plain text of Duet. 24 and accept the interpretation of this verse as we know it was interpreted in the first century, and accept Jesus' dialog as a correction to that interpretation, it presents a serious problem to the viewpoint that SE continues to try and push. If we accept the historical interpretation, we must either assume that God made marriage as unbreakable in Ge. 2, changed his mind in Due. 24, and then changed his mind again in the NT. Or you must accept that God intended that the marriage vow not be broken, but understood that man in his sinfulness would sometimes, in rebellion towards God, break that vow. And that God gave us instructions to handle these situations in both the Old Testament and the New Testament. I prefer the latter explanation because it aligns with God's unchanging character.




SealedEternal -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/23/2008 7:36:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: benelchi

And this represents one of the biggest scriptural problems with SE interpretation.


Neither you nor I am keeping the Old Covenant Law, but of course you quibble over the one aspect of this issue in scripture that is not relevent to anyone reading this and ignore the aspects that do specifically apply, because you know that they are unequivocal and give you no room to manipulate the wording.

quote:

1) This is not a natural understanding of the language of this passage. You have to really twist was written to come to this conclusion.


Then please tell us what is the natural understanding of the language of that passage. Then give us the specific parameters of the Law and how it was to be applied by Old Covenant adherents. Most English translations render it as I stated which is a man finding his wife indecent/unclean when he married her. Beyond that, Jesus clarified that it was an issue of fornication (porneia) which was the Old Covenant allowance rather than adultery (moichaō) as you try to claim.


quote:

2) We have zero evidence from history that the Jewish people or the Early Christian church ever understood this verse as Sealed as presented. And it is a passage that is commented on quite often because different schools within Judaism interpreted this passage differently and they debated the differences quite often; however, none presented the view to which Sealed has.


Obviously they weren't teaching it correctly which is precisely why Jesus condemned them as adulterers and said they were making their wives commit adultery by their unlawful divorce teachings. They would have fully understood that He was proclaiming they deserved to be stoned to death for their misuse of this Law, because that was the penalty for adultery which He charged them with.

quote:

3) This is not the natural understanding of Jesus' comments about this passage. You have to really twist Jesus words to come to this conclusion. Again not even the early church interpreted these verses the way SE does. While the early church did interpret these verses as excluding remarriage, the idea of adultery in betrothal never entered the discussion.


Jesus said specifically that this was in relation to the Law of Moses which you are not keeping, so it is you who is selectively interpreting verses of the Old Covenant Law that suit your needs, and trying to bring them into the New Covenant, while not adhering to the rest which do not suit your needs. You must decide which covenant you are under and either adhere to it completely or recognize that it is not applicable to you, but you can't pick and choose from it as though it is a smorgasbord.

quote:

Because these verses were so heavily discussed by early Judaism and early Christianity we do have a good idea what they understood about these passages. Before anyone should accept the interpretation SE has offered, he should explain why no early reference to this verse ever comes to the same conclusion he has presented. They simply did not understand these verses as he has presented them.


That's simple if you read the text. Jesus was condemning their misuse of this passage and calling them adulterers because they did not teach them properly. So why then would you trust in the interpretations of the very people He was condemning?

quote:

If you look through the history of this thread, you will find that he has simply made "facts" up to support his interpretation this verse, but he has never been able to find any scholarly support for the fallacious claims he has made.


I have Biblical support which is infinitely stronger. Those who appeal to "experts" will always find plenty of support for their conclusions, but of course those who teach the exact opposite have their "experts" as well.

quote:

If we abandon the linguistic gymnastics employed by SE to get around the plain text of Duet. 24 and accept the interpretation of this verse as we know it was interpreted in the first century, and accept Jesus' dialog as a correction to that interpretation, it presents a serious problem to the viewpoint that SE continues to try and push.


Obviously if you side with the people He's condemning for their misuse of the Law you're going to come to the same conclusions they did, but that does not make either of you correct.


quote:

If we accept the historical interpretation, we must either assume that God made marriage as unbreakable in Ge. 2, changed his mind in Due. 24, and then changed his mind again in the NT.


No, you assume that God changed His mind, but Jesus says that divorce and remarriage was adultery from the beginning and under both covenants. The only thing that changed was that the Old Covenant men could annul their marriage covenants if they proved their wives misrepresented their virgin status. Once they were joined together and this wasn't an issue, the Old Covenant also stated that "He could not divorce her all his days" which was true from the beginning through today.


quote:

Or you must accept that God intended that the marriage vow not be broken, but understood that man in his sinfulness would sometimes, in rebellion towards God, break that vow. And that God gave us instructions to handle these situations in both the Old Testament and the New Testament. I prefer the latter explanation because it aligns with God's unchanging character.


You think the God of the Bible made provision to accomodate living in what He defines as adultery?

Mark 10:10-12 In the house the disciples began questioning Him about this again. And He *said to them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery."

Luke 16:18 "Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries one who is divorced from a husband commits adultery.”

That's not the God I know.

SealedEternal




benelchi -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/23/2008 8:42:02 PM)

quote:

You think the God of the Bible made provision to accomodate living in what He defines as adultery?



No, I believe God made provisions to accommodate living in what YOU call adultery. I know you seem to have real difficulty differentiating between YOUR words and those of Christ; however, I do not share in your delusions. I really can tell the difference between your words, and those of my Lord.




keepingfaith -> RE: Remarriage After Divorce - One Stop Thread (11/24/2008 1:04:16 PM)

quote:

I really can tell the difference between your words, and those of my Lord.


And I can tell the difference between your words and those of my Lord...

Luke 16:18
"Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries one who is divorced from a husband commits adultery.”




Page: <<   < prev  425 426 [427] 428 429   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI