|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login  | |
|
RE: Prince Charles - 2/13/2008 2:15:36 PM
|
|
|
1love1God1way
Posts: 2388
Joined: 5/16/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WesSavedByGrace
quote:
ORIGINAL: 1love1God1way
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
Indeed, Gore functions as the prophet of Prince Charles' diabolical message of "global warmiing" which he uses as a pretext to subjugate the inhabitants of the planet earth.
I'm so subjugated. I am so completely overcome and made submissive by An Inconvenient Truth that I might have to take a random trip to Egypt in the middle of the night.
Yo, Ben!
I am gettin' ready to make a greenhouse so that I can fit in with the NWO. Could you snag me a mummy for decoration while you are there?
Yeah man. You can pay me once we have one universal currency.
_____________________________
love.ben
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 2/13/2008 2:21:25 PM
|
|
|
upNORTder
Posts: 220
Joined: 7/20/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: michlang
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
Dear Ted,
Thank you for the link! Although I'm already familiar with much of the contents of Tim Cohen's Prince Charles, Antichrist and a Cup of Tea, it's nice to have the online version. If you appreciated Cohen's take on the Prince, I would urge you to read Joan Veon's Prince Charles, The Sustainable Prince. She offers some compelling evidence on the incredible leverage Prince Charles exerts behind the scenes, especially vis-a-vis the United Nations and "Agenda 21". The following link takes you to some excerpts from her book:
http://www.despatch.cth.com.au/Despatch/Vol93_Charles_sustainable.htm
Charles wields considerable power behind the scenes, and he knows it. He stands in rare company as "first among equals" among the european royalty, even without a statue proclaiming him "Savior of the World". Any way you slice it, Prince Charles is one unique individual; from his being one of the first people on Earth to receive a microchip inplant to his famous statue proclaiming him to be "Savior of the World". From his embrace of Islam, to his desire to change the King of England's title from "Defender of THE Faith" to "Defender of Faiths".
On his honeymoon, which began right before a total eclipse, after cruising the Mediterranean aboard the Brittania, he ended up in Egypt, the home of mystery religions, esp. that of Isis and Osiris. Charles is said to have visited the Great Pyramid at 1:00 in the morning. The Great Pyramid is considered by some to be the resting place of Osiris/Nimrod. If you recall, Osiris was supposedly resurrected by his sister/wife Isis. From what I understand, he's due to return any day now, which adds to the list of claimants to the throne. What I do know is whether it be Nimrod or Osiris, Metraiya or Mashiac, Mahdi or Messiah, the world is expecting the return of the once and future king, in which case "something wicked this way comes!"
In Christ,
Ariel
What a silly conversation this is...do you not know that the apocalypse of John flows from a Jewish genre which is not meant to be interpreted literally? IT IS A COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME to think on or about such notions as the anti-christ or a rapture or whatever. The apocalypse of John was written to inspire hope for a persecuted church, not to detail the "end of time". Since most people here don't seem to care or listen to Christian tradition or church theology, I'm sure no one will listen. But on the off chance someone does, please, stop engaging in a completely useless and futile process in trying to figure anything out about the end.
Considering the many end time prophecies that have already been fulfulled, how can you say this?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 2/13/2008 4:28:04 PM
|
|
|
Isaiah29
Posts: 115
Joined: 5/8/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: upNORTder
quote:
ORIGINAL: michlang
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
Dear Ted,
Thank you for the link! Although I'm already familiar with much of the contents of Tim Cohen's Prince Charles, Antichrist and a Cup of Tea, it's nice to have the online version. If you appreciated Cohen's take on the Prince, I would urge you to read Joan Veon's Prince Charles, The Sustainable Prince. She offers some compelling evidence on the incredible leverage Prince Charles exerts behind the scenes, especially vis-a-vis the United Nations and "Agenda 21". The following link takes you to some excerpts from her book:
http://www.despatch.cth.com.au/Despatch/Vol93_Charles_sustainable.htm
Charles wields considerable power behind the scenes, and he knows it. He stands in rare company as "first among equals" among the european royalty, even without a statue proclaiming him "Savior of the World". Any way you slice it, Prince Charles is one unique individual; from his being one of the first people on Earth to receive a microchip inplant to his famous statue proclaiming him to be "Savior of the World". From his embrace of Islam, to his desire to change the King of England's title from "Defender of THE Faith" to "Defender of Faiths".
On his honeymoon, which began right before a total eclipse, after cruising the Mediterranean aboard the Brittania, he ended up in Egypt, the home of mystery religions, esp. that of Isis and Osiris. Charles is said to have visited the Great Pyramid at 1:00 in the morning. The Great Pyramid is considered by some to be the resting place of Osiris/Nimrod. If you recall, Osiris was supposedly resurrected by his sister/wife Isis. From what I understand, he's due to return any day now, which adds to the list of claimants to the throne. What I do know is whether it be Nimrod or Osiris, Metraiya or Mashiac, Mahdi or Messiah, the world is expecting the return of the once and future king, in which case "something wicked this way comes!"
In Christ,
Ariel
What a silly conversation this is...do you not know that the apocalypse of John flows from a Jewish genre which is not meant to be interpreted literally? IT IS A COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME to think on or about such notions as the anti-christ or a rapture or whatever. The apocalypse of John was written to inspire hope for a persecuted church, not to detail the "end of time". Since most people here don't seem to care or listen to Christian tradition or church theology, I'm sure no one will listen. But on the off chance someone does, please, stop engaging in a completely useless and futile process in trying to figure anything out about the end.
Considering the many end time prophecies that have already been fulfulled, how can you say this?
Dear UpNortder,
I believe Peter said it best:
"Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, 'Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation'." 2Pet. 3:3-4
We are in the "last days", so I fully expect contempt to poured out upon the warnings I issue.
"I will stand upon my watch, and set me upon the tower, and will watch to see what He will say unto me, and what I shall answer when I am reproved. And the LORD answered me, and said, 'Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that reads it'. For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry. Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith. Yes also, because he transgresses by wine, he is a proud man, neither keeps at home, who enlarges his desire as hell, and is as death, and cannot be satisfied, but gathers unto him all nations, and heaps unto him all people". Hab. 2: 1-5
The dark prince cometh, and he rides a green horse; but Jesus will put an early end to his wicked rule!
"And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. Mat. 23:22
In Christ,
Ariel
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 7/21/2008 12:17:10 AM
|
|
|
cow451
Posts: 3959
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ted2
Hello Gang....it has been a while....I found two outstanding videos that want to share with you all...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKRUMtytZPM&feature=related part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXupGNsRFKM&feature=related parte 2
If anyone know the title of the theme song in these videos, please let know.
I do not receive emails notification when someone replies...so if anyone be so courteous, please notify me at
profeprofeta @ hotmail.com Thank you and God (Jesus) bless you !! ted x.
Maybe you could just check back for replies. Only an idiot gets anything from YouTube besides entertainment. Any moron can post a video. There is NO statue of Prince Charles in Brazil. Check post 131 for a refresher course.
And, BTW, just in case you were going to reprise the Planet X baloney... don't bother.
_____________________________
Wenn Sie so intelligent sind, warum Sie hier sind?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 8/20/2008 3:35:59 PM
|
|
|
cow451
Posts: 3959
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ted2
It is right before your eyes and can not see the truth...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptufoMx7EKE&feature=related
So who is the.....????
God[ Jesus] bless you, ted x.
Note to ted2 (are you related to ted1?): I don't do youtube for anything serious. If you got something real, call us back.
_____________________________
Wenn Sie so intelligent sind, warum Sie hier sind?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 8/20/2008 6:20:43 PM
|
|
|
Isaiah29
Posts: 115
Joined: 5/8/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ted2
It is right before your eyes and can not see the truth...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptufoMx7EKE&feature=related
So who is the.....????
God[ Jesus] bless you, ted x.
Greetings Ted,
It is nice to hear from you again. Pay no attention to querulous cow and his witless rants. Jesus spoke well of his ilk when he stated:
"They are like unto children sitting in the marketplace, and calling one to another, and saying, 'We have piped unto you, and ye have not danced; we have mourned to you, and ye have not wept'." Luke 7: 32
Ever criticising yet never offering any original insight, he would rather insult the messenger rather than discuss the message, hence he never learns from the material presented because he already thinks he knows better.
"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools..." Rom. 1: 22.
He cannot perceive that it doesn't matter what medium truth is presented, provided it is still truth. The fact that the National Enquirer broke the story of John Edwards' extramarital affair did not make the story any less true, even though Edwards repeatedly denied it and the main stream media refused to investigate it.
The fact that this information is presented on Youtube does not diminish its reliability or its relevance. In fact all of the information in the video and much much more has already been presented in this thread and has been properly sourced for anyone seeking to verify it. We can't help it if certain posters on this thread are too lazy or ignorant to research it for themselves, much as the media would not deign to investigate the Edward's affair. Time will tell whether it is true or not. I'm just praying that I won't be around to say "I told you so!"
"Therefore, behold, I will proceed to do a marvellous work among this people, even a marvellous work and a wonder: for the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid." Is. 29:14
In Christ,
Ariel
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 8/21/2008 10:00:01 AM
|
|
|
cow451
Posts: 3959
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
In fact all of the information in the video and much much more has already been presented in this thread and has been properly sourced for anyone seeking to verify it.
In Christ,
Ariel
And debunked. But please feel free to bring it back for redebunking.
_____________________________
Wenn Sie so intelligent sind, warum Sie hier sind?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 8/21/2008 1:17:28 PM
|
|
|
Isaiah29
Posts: 115
Joined: 5/8/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cow451
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
In fact all of the information in the video and much much more has already been presented in this thread and has been properly sourced for anyone seeking to verify it.
In Christ,
Ariel
And debunked. But please feel free to bring it back for redebunking.
Show me a single source or article which you have so brilliantly debunked,
and perhaps I'll spend more than a microsecond considering what you have to say. Until then, your protestations are as worthless as the cackles of a crow on a powerline.
In Christ,
Ariel
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 8/21/2008 4:41:59 PM
|
|
|
cow451
Posts: 3959
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
quote:
ORIGINAL: cow451
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
In fact all of the information in the video and much much more has already been presented in this thread and has been properly sourced for anyone seeking to verify it.
In Christ,
Ariel
And debunked. But please feel free to bring it back for redebunking.
Show me a single source or article which you have so brilliantly debunked,
and perhaps I'll spend more than a microsecond considering what you have to say. Until then, your protestations are as worthless as the cackles of a crow on a powerline.
In Christ,
Ariel
Try post # 141.
_____________________________
Wenn Sie so intelligent sind, warum Sie hier sind?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 8/21/2008 6:55:12 PM
|
|
|
Isaiah29
Posts: 115
Joined: 5/8/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cow451
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
quote:
ORIGINAL: cow451
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
In fact all of the information in the video and much much more has already been presented in this thread and has been properly sourced for anyone seeking to verify it.
In Christ,
Ariel
And debunked. But please feel free to bring it back for redebunking.
Show me a single source or article which you have so brilliantly debunked,
and perhaps I'll spend more than a microsecond considering what you have to say. Until then, your protestations are as worthless as the cackles of a crow on a powerline.
In Christ,
Ariel
Try post # 141.
LOL...try again! Pointing out that the statue is merely the model of the statue that has been commissioned does not debunk the article at all, for the article states plainly that the statue is a "replica". Do you even read the articles you supposedly debunk? Here is the BBC article on the same subject: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1857482.stm.
I do not know if the "life size" statue has been built yet or not. Frankly, whether or not it has is irrelevant to the arguement, for Prince Charles has in his possession the bronze "replica", which clearly depicts him as a winged being "saving the world". Now, can you offer a better example of your debunking skills? Otherwise, what I have posted thus far remains incontrovertible.
In Christ,
Ariel
Edited TOS 6
< Message edited by Kath -- 8/22/2008 3:16:29 PM >
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 8/22/2008 2:50:36 PM
|
|
|
cow451
Posts: 3959
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
quote:
ORIGINAL: cow451
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
quote:
ORIGINAL: cow451
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
In fact all of the information in the video and much much more has already been presented in this thread and has been properly sourced for anyone seeking to verify it.
In Christ,
Ariel
And debunked. But please feel free to bring it back for redebunking.
Show me a single source or article which you have so brilliantly debunked,
and perhaps I'll spend more than a microsecond considering what you have to say. Until then, your protestations are as worthless as the cackles of a crow on a powerline.
In Christ,
Ariel
Try post # 141.
LOL...try again! Pointing out that the statue is merely the model of the statue that has been commissioned does not debunk the article at all, for the article states plainly that the statue is a "replica". Do you even read the articles you supposedly debunk? Here is the BBC article on the same subject: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1857482.stm.
I do not know if the "life size" statue has been built yet or not. Frankly, whether or not it has is irrelevant to the arguement, for Prince Charles has in his possession the bronze "replica", which clearly depicts him as a winged being "saving the world". If that is the best you can do to debunk the information presented in this thread, then you might as well post on a thread more to your intellectual level, eg. Sports and Hobbies. Now, can you offer a better example of your debunking skills? Otherwise, what I have posted thus far remains incontrovertible.
In Christ,
Ariel
Personal attack aside, no statue, no "proof". It's been six years, plenty of time.
BTW, your link doesn't work.
_____________________________
Wenn Sie so intelligent sind, warum Sie hier sind?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 8/24/2008 7:07:11 PM
|
|
|
Isaiah29
Posts: 115
Joined: 5/8/2005
Status: offline
|
Hi Cow,
Try this link,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1857482.stm
It's the same link without the period at the end.
Here's another:
http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1678.cfm
The point is the statue has already been made, although in a diminished form. The fact that it is 1 foot instead of 10 feet does not nullify the reality of its existence or the essence of its message: ie depicting Prince Charles as a winged savior "saving the world", the inhabitants of which being depicted as the huddled, downtrodden masses (and without wings, I might add).
You say the larger statue has yet to be made. So what? The smaller one already has been, and we have many pictures of it. But rather than discuss the significance of the meaning of the statue, you prefer to quibble about whether the larger version of the same statue has yet to be built. Let me ask you this. At what size does an idol become an idol, a blasphemy become a blasphemy? Because the mantle size, house-hold buddah is so much smaller than the temple buddah, is it then a lesser idol? Is the act of paying it homeage a lesser sacrilege? Are they not the same, though one is smaller? They are the same, and we can thereby conclude that the smaller replica of the statue that has been commissioned is necessarily of the same order of blasphemy as the one which is to be built.
In Christ,
Ariel
ps. Sorry about the "personal attack". It was meant more as joke, given your avatar. I do admit it was somewhat clumsy attempt at humour, however, and I repent that I posted it.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 8/25/2008 2:09:26 PM
|
|
|
cow451
Posts: 3959
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
Hi Cow,
Try this link,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1857482.stm
It's the same link without the period at the end.
Here's another:
http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1678.cfm
The point is the statue has already been made, although in a diminished form. The fact that it is 1 foot instead of 10 feet does not nullify the reality of its existence or the essence of its message: ie depicting Prince Charles as a winged savior "saving the world", the inhabitants of which being depicted as the huddled, downtrodden masses (and without wings, I might add).
You say the larger statue has yet to be made. So what? The smaller one already has been, and we have many pictures of it. But rather than discuss the significance of the meaning of the statue, you prefer to quibble about whether the larger version of the same statue has yet to be built. Let me ask you this. At what size does an idol become an idol, a blasphemy become a blasphemy? Because the mantle size, house-hold buddah is so much smaller than the temple buddah, is it then a lesser idol? Is the act of paying it homeage a lesser sacrilege? Are they not the same, though one is smaller? They are the same, and we can thereby conclude that the smaller replica of the statue that has been commissioned is necessarily of the same order of blasphemy as the one which is to be built.
In Christ,
Ariel
ps. Sorry about the "personal attack". It was meant more as joke, given your avatar. I do admit it was somewhat clumsy attempt at humour, however, and I repent that I posted it.
You seriously think that a one-foot model of a planned statue in central Brazil is significant????????????? Six years have passed since the announcement and still no statue. Hardly an endorsement for the "savior of the world", LOL.
The Cangacu research station consists of thatched wooden buildings perched on stilts in a swamp.
The royal party got there by taking a plane from Rio to Palmas, followed by a helicopter and then a motor launch along the piranha-infested Javaes River.
_____________________________
Wenn Sie so intelligent sind, warum Sie hier sind?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 8/27/2008 8:29:25 PM
|
|
|
Isaiah29
Posts: 115
Joined: 5/8/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cow451
quote:
ORIGINAL: WesP
quote:
The Cangacu research station consists of thatched wooden buildings perched on stilts in a swamp.
The royal party got there by taking a plane from Rio to Palmas, followed by a helicopter and then a motor launch along the piranha-infested Javaes River.
Using claims of obscurity to bolster your opinion, cow? 
The only way to get more removed from civilization would be to build the statue in Alabama. 
LOL, a rare flash of humour, cow?
So what you are suggesting now is that because the statue was given to Prince Charles in some remote corner of the world, it carries no significance. Since Prince Charles was in the wilderness, the action of presenting him with a statue that glorifies him as an angelic being was less blasphemous than if he had been in downtown London or New York.
Should I remind you that when the Lord Jesus Christ was tempted by Satan, it was not in the crowded streets of Jerusalem or even in Rome, the political center of the Roman Empire, but rather in the desolate wilderness of Judea. While in the wilderness and on the heels of a 40 day fast, Jesus was offered untold power and glory if He would only bow down and worship Satan.
"And the devil, taking Him up into an high mountain, showed unto Him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said unto Him, 'All this power will I give you, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If you therefore will worship me, all shall be yours'." Luke 4: 5-7
Jesus' answer was clear and unequivocable:
And Jesus answered and said unto him, 'Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, 'Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve'." Luke 5: 8
Seems like the devil chose a rather secluded location in which to tempt Jesus. Could he have done the same with Prince Charles? Whereas Jesus refused the devil's offer of dominion, Prince Charles accepted the statue, and quite possibly his putative role as "savior of mankind".
Also of interest is that in Jesus' case, the temptation took place in an arid, desert wilderness, whereas in the case of Prince Charles', this particular event took place in a rain soaked jungle on the other side of the world, which would add to the list of the "anti" Christ characteristics and events which have helped shape Prince Charles life, in this case "anti" meaning "opposite", not "against".
In Christ,
Ariel
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 8/28/2008 12:52:24 PM
|
|
|
cow451
Posts: 3959
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Isaiah29
quote:
ORIGINAL: cow451
quote:
ORIGINAL: WesP
quote:
The Cangacu research station consists of thatched wooden buildings perched on stilts in a swamp.
The royal party got there by taking a plane from Rio to Palmas, followed by a helicopter and then a motor launch along the piranha-infested Javaes River.
Using claims of obscurity to bolster your opinion, cow?
The only way to get more removed from civilization would be to build the statue in Alabama.
LOL, a rare flash of humour, cow?
So what you are suggesting now is that because the statue was given to Prince Charles in some remote corner of the world, it carries no significance.
Exactly.
quote:
Since Prince Charles was in the wilderness, the action of presenting him with a statue that glorifies him as an angelic being was less blasphemous than if he had been in downtown London or New York.
Should I remind you that when the Lord Jesus Christ was tempted by Satan, it was not in the crowded streets of Jerusalem or even in Rome, the political center of the Roman Empire, but rather in the desolate wilderness of Judea. While in the wilderness and on the heels of a 40 day fast, Jesus was offered untold power and glory if He would only bow down and worship Satan.
"And the devil, taking Him up into an high mountain, showed unto Him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said unto Him, 'All this power will I give you, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If you therefore will worship me, all shall be yours'." Luke 4: 5-7
Jesus' answer was clear and unequivocable:
And Jesus answered and said unto him, 'Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, 'Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve'." Luke 5: 8
Seems like the devil chose a rather secluded location in which to tempt Jesus. Could he have done the same with Prince Charles? Whereas Jesus refused the devil's offer of dominion, Prince Charles accepted the statue, and quite possibly his putative role as "savior of mankind".
Also of interest is that in Jesus' case, the temptation took place in an arid, desert wilderness, whereas in the case of Prince Charles', this particular event took place in a rain soaked jungle on the other side of the world, which would add to the list of the "anti" Christ characteristics and events which have helped shape Prince Charles life, in this case "anti" meaning "opposite", not "against".
In Christ,
Ariel
Satan had something to offer Christ besides a foot-tall statue and a chance to play soccer with the natives, LOL. Speaking of blasphemy, the mere fact you compare Prince Chuck with Christ is laughable. Blasphemy alone does not point to the Antichrist, BTW.
_____________________________
Wenn Sie so intelligent sind, warum Sie hier sind?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Prince Charles - 8/28/2008 7:12:28 PM
|
|
|
Thessa
Posts: 811
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: goingupupup
I was reading about Prince Charles coming to the U.S to talk to Bush, he want's Bush to take it easier on the Islamics, why? I am wondering why he is taking this stance.
Does he and/or his stature come into play in the last days.
Although i dont particularly like Prince Charles and i believe he had something to do with Diana's death, i dont think the end times play into him at all. It would be too obvious...lol
|
|
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
 Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|
Forum Tools
Printable Version
