|
Isaiah29 -> RE: Prince Charles (11/6/2005 7:10:39 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: goingupupup oh please don't provoke her as we'll have to put up with her repeating all her threads to date, I don't know why if you want to discuss something, others who have no opionion other than scarcasism want to mock others, I guess it is up to us to respond or not, I no longer play head games with these types, as I already had my go around in circles and got tired of chasing empty arguements, as so did others in these forums, it don't matter what proof or opinion you have there are some who will scoff and add nothing construtive to the thread, the bible says there will be scoffers in the last days, what does it matter if we want to waste our time it is our time and it is only our opinion of ourselves that matters as "other peoples opinion of me are none of my business" and "have a nice day unless you have other plans" or ""more will be revealed" is my favorite sayings hope some of you will find them useful in your everyday conversations. Getting back to Charles it would be interesting to get a list of all the company's and clubs of the world he is involved in, I'll go on a search and see what I can find, if anybody knows of any please post them so we can have a look. thanks Dear Goingupupup, In regards to Prince Charles' controlling interest in many global corporations, I believe Joan Veon has probably written the definitive work thus far. Her book "The Sustainable Prince", is a veritable gold mine of information on his holdings as well as his involvement in the UN, the US' own version of the Trojan horse, which Great Britain lobbied heavily to create after the collapse of the first world government attempt, ie. the ill fated "League of Nations". The anti-Christ will need a mechanism with which to control the daily lives of the "citizens of the world", and the UN is well on its way to becoming just that mechanism, bringing huge areas of the world's surface under its domain through its various, nefarious treaties, by which it continues to subsume the sovereignty of nations; in many cases sovereignty over land, water, air and even people. We already have large restricted biodiversity preserves in America, and the rest of the world, cordoned off and overseen by the UN. The World Wildlife Fund, created by Prince Phillip, works the same agenda, continuing to carve out enormous portions of the world's habitable surface for "game preserves". My guess is that these will get ever larger in accordance with the illuminati plan to depopulate and deindustrialize North America, as well as much of the rest of the world, thus returning the planet to its original pristine condition, pre-man so to speak. This is why Prince Phillip stated he wanted to return as a virus, in order to reduce the world's population and thus lessen the deleterious effect mankind is supposed to be having upon mother earth, the mystical Gaia. Prince Charles' leadership and development of the Green movement cannot be understated, for it lends a certain amount of light on his and Camilla's recent visit to the organic farming community in California.. That he would spotlight the simple organic farming methods featured in Marin County, while maintaining a controlling interest in Archer Daniel Midland Corporation, the world's largest mega farm corporation, may seem contradictory at first. But much like Michael Moore railing at multinational corporations while owning stock in the same, there is a Prince Charles for the public viewing, and there is the behind the scenes Prince Charles. The public Prince Charles wants to save the world. The private Prince Charles wants to rule it. If he is not carving up the planet for himself, then Prince Charles is quite possibly laying the groundwork for his eldest son, Prince William to step in and take control. As I stated before, there is also compelling evidence indicating that Prince William could also be a viable candidate, especially when viewing the anti-Christ as being "opposite" to Christ, as opposed to simply "against" Christ, or "instead" of Christ, but that can be discussed at a later time. In Christ, Ariel
|
|
|
|