Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

RE: Vice President Debate

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Election 2008 >> RE: Vice President Debate
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
[Poll]

Vice President Debate


Sen. Joe Biden won
  33% (25)
Gov. Sarah Palin won
  48% (36)
Draw
  17% (13)


Total Votes : 74


(last vote on : 10/7/2008 3:28:06 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 1:59:14 PM   
stampinlady


Posts: 1570
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: Northern IL
Status: offline
quote:

She doesn't support legal rights for homosexuals.


And that's wrong, imo. It's discrimination.

Lisa, she may have voted against it in her state, but she needs to let the nation know EXACTLY where she stands, plain and simple.

Yes, Greg, she did skirt it a bit.

_____________________________

Deb
Post #: 176
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:00:44 PM   
GregandJenny

 

Posts: 617
Joined: 2/16/2006
From: Near Seattle Washington
Status: offline
quote:

I felt she was trying to make it clear that she doesn't hate homosexuals.


I agree 100%. I know it's a fine line and in an election like this everything matters. she did justice to that side of it. Just not to the other

_____________________________

It does not have to be well with my circumstance to be well with my soul!
Post #: 177
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:02:25 PM   
Consecrated2God


Posts: 4939
Joined: 4/4/2005
From: Formerly Jesus Land
Status: online
Of course they have legal rights--we all have legal rights. What she is against is homosexual couples having the same legal rights as married couples. I agree with her.

_____________________________

<--Plantation house in Louisiana
Post #: 178
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:02:25 PM   
LivingParadox


Posts: 803
Joined: 2/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stampinlady

quote:

She doesn't support legal rights for homosexuals.


And that's wrong, imo. It's discrimination.

Lisa, she may have voted against it in her state, but she needs to let the nation know EXACTLY where she stands, plain and simple.

Yes, Greg, she did skirt it a bit.


She supports that homosexuals have the SAME rights, just not special ones.
Post #: 179
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:03:37 PM   
ekserekseez

 

Posts: 661
Joined: 7/3/2008
Status: offline
quote:

It's the parents who detest their sons lifestyle choice who say we don't want to have anything to do with Joe's partner, we don't want him here.


If parents think that some how they are going to "save" their gay adult child, or bring about some reconciliation, by denying their partner access to them in the hospital, they're crazy. The parents might have the right to do this, but it's a really good way to drive their child away forever.

Now that we're off topic, to bring it back around: I think what Palin was saying was this very thing: if a gay adult wants their partner at their bedside in the hospital, it should be allowed. This isn't a matter of "special rights," it's a matter of decency.
Post #: 180
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:05:54 PM   
letusreason


Posts: 809
Joined: 8/30/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tracydolls


I'm also willing to bet, she gives no more interviews to Couric.


She has already expressed her disatisfaction with the pop quiz mentality of a ratings seeking democrat news girl so you are probably right.
Post #: 181
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:06:20 PM   
LivingParadox


Posts: 803
Joined: 2/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ekserekseez

quote:

It's the parents who detest their sons lifestyle choice who say we don't want to have anything to do with Joe's partner, we don't want him here.


If parents think that some how they are going to "save" their gay adult child, or bring about some reconciliation, by denying their partner access to them in the hospital, they're crazy. The parents might have the right to do this, but it's a really good way to drive their child away forever.

Now that we're off topic, to bring it back around: I think what Palin was saying was this very thing: if a gay adult wants their partner at their bedside in the hospital, it should be allowed. This isn't a matter of "special rights," it's a matter of decency.


That I agree. And the partners should make legal arrangements for these kinds of instances.
Post #: 182
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:06:55 PM   
ekserekseez

 

Posts: 661
Joined: 7/3/2008
Status: offline
I'll be she quits while she's ahead and doesn't give interviews to anyone. She'll be a talking head behind a podium until November.
Post #: 183
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:08:20 PM   
GregandJenny

 

Posts: 617
Joined: 2/16/2006
From: Near Seattle Washington
Status: offline
quote:


She supports that homosexuals have the SAME rights, just not special ones.


I agree the same rights as a "dating" couple would have. NOT a Married one. I don't think it's discriminatory because Marriage is between a man and a woman and should be between man and a woman. You cannot redesign or relegislate something that is a God given institution. You might think you can change the definition but you can't redefine the things of God.


GH

_____________________________

It does not have to be well with my circumstance to be well with my soul!
Post #: 184
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:09:44 PM   
GregandJenny

 

Posts: 617
Joined: 2/16/2006
From: Near Seattle Washington
Status: offline
quote:

Of course they have legal rights--we all have legal rights. What she is against is homosexual couples having the same legal rights as married couples. I agree with her.


this is a statement she should have made at the debate.

_____________________________

It does not have to be well with my circumstance to be well with my soul!
Post #: 185
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:21:41 PM   
Consecrated2God


Posts: 4939
Joined: 4/4/2005
From: Formerly Jesus Land
Status: online
ATTENTION: Moderator's Note


The topic of this thread is not polygamy. Please bring this thread back on topic.

Please do not reply to this message within the Community.

Please email Community@salemwebnetwork.com with questions, comments, or concerns.

Please do not send me PMs regarding this message.

Thank you for your attention and complicance in this matter.

Lisa Luper
Faith Community Network
Forums Moderator

_____________________________

<--Plantation house in Louisiana
Post #: 186
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:22:47 PM   
ekserekseez

 

Posts: 661
Joined: 7/3/2008
Status: offline
So would anyone else here like to see a second VP debate, maybe in a different format?
Post #: 187
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:28:04 PM   
stampinlady


Posts: 1570
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: Northern IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ekserekseez

So would anyone else here like to see a second VP debate, maybe in a different format?


Does it really matter in the long run? I don't think so.

_____________________________

Deb
Post #: 188
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:36:25 PM   
Consecrated2God


Posts: 4939
Joined: 4/4/2005
From: Formerly Jesus Land
Status: online
quote:

So would anyone else here like to see a second VP debate, maybe in a different format?


I would--I thought it was a lot more interesting than the Presidential debates. As for a different format--I'd like to see them face-off on forums!

_____________________________

<--Plantation house in Louisiana
Post #: 189
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:39:09 PM   
TaoPoohBear


Posts: 538
Joined: 1/18/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dubya

quote:

ORIGINAL: TaoPoohBear

quote:

ORIGINAL: letusreason

Palin was all about substance .....


AND that's the scary part -

“Nuclear war would be the be-all end-all of too many people and too many parts of our planet.” - Sarah Palin

Yeah, sure, ya betcha.

What, exactlly, is your objection to that statement?

Do you understand the context?


I understand the context -

quote:

IFILL: Governor, on another issue, interventionism, nuclear weapons. What should be the trigger, or should there be a trigger, when nuclear weapons use is ever put into play?
http://news.spreadit.org/vp-debate-transcript-2008vp-debate-text/

quote:

Biden - "....with regard to arms control and weapons, nuclear weapons require a nuclear arms control regime. John McCain voted against a Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty that every Republican has supported.
John McCain has opposed amending the Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty with an amendment to allow for inspections.


I mean, I know you CONservatives like it simple, but simple-minded?!
Post #: 190
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:39:40 PM   
Dubya


Posts: 1033
Joined: 10/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Consecrated2God

Hey, I was just sharing the way it came across to me. But really, what I said was very mild compared to the many, many nasty remarks made about Palin on these boards.

I understand what you are saying. Yes there have been some very cruel and stupid comments made about Palin (another thread is dedicated to that).

But if you have ever lost someone very dear to you, you would understand that that is something you never get over. For that reason, I believe Biden's emotion is very, very genuine. He lost his beloved wife and an infant daughter. In addition, his two young sons were critically injured and there was lingering doubt that they would survive. One of those sons is the one just sent off to Iraq with his military unit. I am quite certain that Biden has a combination of deep grief when he recalls that event combined with a sense of very deep pride in his son who survived and is doing so well today.

I think it is important to retain a sense of humanity when engaging in political debates. I do not support Joe Biden's politics but I have a deep sense of respect for him as a man and father.
Post #: 191
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:41:13 PM   
ekserekseez

 

Posts: 661
Joined: 7/3/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I would--I thought it was a lot more interesting than the Presidential debates. As for a different format--I'd like to see them face-off on forums!


Only if you moderate. And I promise not to whine about your ideological bias.
Post #: 192
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:41:53 PM   
ManimalX


Posts: 1232
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GregandJenny

quote:

ou don't have to have any special legislation to give them that right, since no one has denied them that anyway.


Actually they have. This is really where the issue is with many homosexuals. if a homosexual is dying and say I am the parent of that then I can decide if the "partner stays in the room". If I am dying no one can tell my wife to leave the hospital, she has a "legal" right to me if you will. The people who aren't legally married don't have that. their next of kin may be a sibling, or a parent and that person is then in control.
G


And this is exactly how it should be. If a girl goes to a hospital and the parents don't want her boyfriend to be there, guess what? He doesn't get to be there. If a homosexual is dying and the parents don't want a "partner" to be there, then they don't get to be there. Your analogy about your wife doesn't work because marriage is for a man and a woman. If two men want to practice disgusting sexual deviance, fine. But they put themselves in that situation and there should never be any special rights that make it easier for them to be homosexuals. If I one day decide that I like hopping on one foot to get around rather than walk with two, I wouldn't expect special one-footed-hopping rules for the next marathon I want to enter.

_____________________________

"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed." - 2nd Peter 3:10
Post #: 193
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:42:06 PM   
GregandJenny

 

Posts: 617
Joined: 2/16/2006
From: Near Seattle Washington
Status: offline
quote:

I think it is important to retain a sense of humanity when engaging in political debates. I do not support Joe Biden's politics but I have a deep sense of respect for him as a man and father.


Well said Dubya, Very well said.

_____________________________

It does not have to be well with my circumstance to be well with my soul!
Post #: 194
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:42:54 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 5393
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stampinlady

quote:

She doesn't support legal rights for homosexuals.


And that's wrong, imo. It's discrimination.


According to the bible, or man's idea of what is right and wrong?

_____________________________

John
Proverbs 29:12 If a ruler hearken to lies, all his servants are wicked.
Post #: 195
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:44:49 PM   
GregandJenny

 

Posts: 617
Joined: 2/16/2006
From: Near Seattle Washington
Status: offline
quote:

Your analogy about your wife doesn't work because marriage is for a man and a woman.


Exactly if you read all my posts that is what I was trying to say!!!

_____________________________

It does not have to be well with my circumstance to be well with my soul!
Post #: 196
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:45:41 PM   
ekserekseez

 

Posts: 661
Joined: 7/3/2008
Status: offline
quote:

If I one day decide that I like hopping on one foot to get around rather than walk with two, I wouldn't expect special one-footed-hopping rules for the next marathon I want to enter.


No, but nobody would stop you from hopping, either. Your earlier statements are incorrect or inaccurate; see earlier postings on the thread, which has been brought back into line by our distinguished moderator (who agreed with me on something today!).

Bringing this back in line with the thread, it appears from Palin's statement in the VP debate that she also supports legal remedies, but not marriage, to allow same-sex partners access to hospital rooms and other situations.
Post #: 197
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:50:37 PM   
ManimalX


Posts: 1232
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
Sorry I misunderstood your position from the post I quoted. I just read through the rest of your posts and realize that we are saying the same thing :)

My apologies.

_____________________________

"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed." - 2nd Peter 3:10
Post #: 198
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:57:14 PM   
letusreason


Posts: 809
Joined: 8/30/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ekserekseez

I'll be she quits while she's ahead and doesn't give interviews to anyone. She'll be a talking head behind a podium until November.


Why should she? The last interviews were senseless in their questioning. Homosexuals, newspappers, legal decisions.
Post #: 199
RE: Vice President Debate - 10/4/2008 2:59:32 PM   
letusreason


Posts: 809
Joined: 8/30/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ekserekseez

quote:

If I one day decide that I like hopping on one foot to get around rather than walk with two, I wouldn't expect special one-footed-hopping rules for the next marathon I want to enter.


No, but nobody would stop you from hopping, either. Your earlier statements are incorrect or inaccurate; see earlier postings on the thread, which has been brought back into line by our distinguished moderator (who agreed with me on something today!).

Bringing this back in line with the thread, it appears from Palin's statement in the VP debate that she also supports legal remedies, but not marriage, to allow same-sex partners access to hospital rooms and other situations.


"not marriage"? What's your definition of marriage?
Post #: 200
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Election 2008 >> RE: Vice President Debate
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out |