Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

RE: Ken Ham

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Science & Origins >> RE: Ken Ham
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Ken Ham - 9/18/2008 12:42:22 PM   
cow451


Posts: 3960
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drmark

quote:

YEC is inconsistent with modern scientific knowledge period.
You really don't get it, do you cow. I can make the same bald assertion that GTE is inconsistent with modern scientific knowledge, period, and be just as "scientific" as you! Because origins science is by its very nature totally dependent on faith-based assumptions and preconceived worldview biases. And that's the simple truth.


YEC's frequently make bald assertions that have no scientific merit.

YEC is a religious doctrine, not science and at least you admit it..

_____________________________

Wenn Sie so intelligent sind, warum Sie hier sind?
Post #: 26
RE: Ken Ham - 9/18/2008 3:59:14 PM   
drmark

 

Posts: 3143
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
Why will you not admit that uniformitarian naturalism is also a religious doctrine, cow? It appears only one of us is being truly scientific here and it's not the person in denial!

_____________________________

Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
Post #: 27
RE: Ken Ham - 9/18/2008 4:14:02 PM   
unclemonkey


Posts: 956
Joined: 5/14/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL:cow451
quote:

YEC is inconsistent with modern scientific knowledge period.

We know that’s your mantra cow, but do you really think continually chanting it will make it true? You give yourself the appearance of being quite superstitious.

_____________________________

"For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me." - John 5:46
Visit my home church.
Post #: 28
RE: Ken Ham - 9/18/2008 4:55:55 PM   
cow451


Posts: 3960
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drmark

Why will you not admit that uniformitarian naturalism is also a religious doctrine, cow? It appears only one of us is being truly scientific here and it's not the person in denial!


You must be confusing uniformitarian with Unitarian. I know. They sound so much alike.

Yet another thread that appears to have reached the end of its useful life.

_____________________________

Wenn Sie so intelligent sind, warum Sie hier sind?
Post #: 29
RE: Ken Ham - 9/18/2008 4:59:32 PM   
cow451


Posts: 3960
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: unclemonkey

ORIGINAL:cow451
quote:

YEC is inconsistent with modern scientific knowledge period.

We know that’s your mantra cow, but do you really think continually chanting it will make it true? You give yourself the appearance of being quite superstitious.


Yeah, whatever. BTW, went to your website. Trucking ministry is a great idea.

_____________________________

Wenn Sie so intelligent sind, warum Sie hier sind?
Post #: 30
RE: Ken Ham - 9/18/2008 5:38:25 PM   
unclemonkey


Posts: 956
Joined: 5/14/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL:cow451
quote:

Trucking ministry is a great idea.

Thank you. I agree. We have had two truckers accept Christ since we started it, and that's what it is all about.
Did you listen to any of the sermons?
"A Good Man Lost" and "Little Foxes in the Vinyard" are two of my favorites. Plus I think the series on prayer is awesome.

_____________________________

"For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me." - John 5:46
Visit my home church.
Post #: 31
RE: Ken Ham - 9/19/2008 8:56:31 AM   
Consecrated2God


Posts: 4924
Joined: 4/4/2005
From: Formerly Jesus Land
Status: offline
Let's get back on topic, please.

quote:

The museum idea, which i thought was wrong, turned out to be a great idea. Ideas are good but so is bricks and mortar.


It is a beautiful museum. We finally got to visit it about a month ago, and we were really impressed with the quality of everything. I've been listening to Ken Ham since I was a little squirt. It was neat seeing the museum he built.

_____________________________

<--Plantation house in Louisiana
Post #: 32
RE: Ken Ham - 9/19/2008 10:23:29 AM   
KaseyTom

 

Posts: 163
Joined: 9/12/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Consecrated2God

Let's get back on topic, please.

quote:

The museum idea, which i thought was wrong, turned out to be a great idea. Ideas are good but so is bricks and mortar.


It is a beautiful museum. We finally got to visit it about a month ago, and we were really impressed with the quality of everything. I've been listening to Ken Ham since I was a little squirt. It was neat seeing the museum he built.


If you don't mind me asking, have you been to a prestigious secular museum of natural science?
Post #: 33
RE: Ken Ham - 9/19/2008 1:09:42 PM   
DanJames


Posts: 677
Joined: 12/13/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Consecrated2God

Let's get back on topic, please.

quote:

The museum idea, which i thought was wrong, turned out to be a great idea. Ideas are good but so is bricks and mortar.


It is a beautiful museum. We finally got to visit it about a month ago, and we were really impressed with the quality of everything. I've been listening to Ken Ham since I was a little squirt. It was neat seeing the museum he built.

It was great, but it definitely has room for improvement.
Post #: 34
RE: Ken Ham - 9/19/2008 4:09:35 PM   
Consecrated2God


Posts: 4924
Joined: 4/4/2005
From: Formerly Jesus Land
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KaseyTom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Consecrated2God

Let's get back on topic, please.

quote:

The museum idea, which i thought was wrong, turned out to be a great idea. Ideas are good but so is bricks and mortar.


It is a beautiful museum. We finally got to visit it about a month ago, and we were really impressed with the quality of everything. I've been listening to Ken Ham since I was a little squirt. It was neat seeing the museum he built.


If you don't mind me asking, have you been to a prestigious secular museum of natural science?


I've been to a lot of different museums, although I'm not sure if I've been to one that would fit what you describe, but that really doesn't have anything to do with Ken Ham.

_____________________________

<--Plantation house in Louisiana
Post #: 35
RE: Ken Ham - 9/23/2008 12:10:48 AM   
CliffBST

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 9/22/2008
Status: offline
Ken Ham is a wonderful Christian, and has put together a scientifically oriented organization that supports the Biblical Creation events. The key issue as stated by AiG, is that you have a situation where two groups of scientists, analyzing the same data, come to completly different conclusions. The reason for this, is that they started with different presuppositions: biblical vs. non-biblical. There is alot of scientific evidence that does NOT support Big Bank/billions year old universe, i.e. "spiral galaxies", "blue-light starts", degradation of comets, the "horizion effect", "time-light travel", etc. Recent Carbon 14 dating experiments have shown that geological samples of "coal", thought to be millions of year old, where only thousands of years old. Ken Ham is currently on his way to China, at the request of the Chinese government, to start a similar museum project in their country. God works in mysterious ways. God Bless,
Post #: 36
RE: Ken Ham - 9/23/2008 2:24:54 AM   
whisperingwaters


Posts: 153
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: Michigan
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CliffBST

Ken Ham is a wonderful Christian, and has put together a scientifically oriented organization that supports the Biblical Creation events. The key issue as stated by AiG, is that you have a situation where two groups of scientists, analyzing the same data, come to completly different conclusions. The reason for this, is that they started with different presuppositions: biblical vs. non-biblical. There is alot of scientific evidence that does NOT support Big Bank/billions year old universe, i.e. "spiral galaxies", "blue-light starts", degradation of comets, the "horizion effect", "time-light travel", etc. Recent Carbon 14 dating experiments have shown that geological samples of "coal", thought to be millions of year old, where only thousands of years old. Ken Ham is currently on his way to China, at the request of the Chinese government, to start a similar museum project in their country. God works in mysterious ways. God Bless,




Thats great news that he is going to China!

I heard Ken Ham speak in person once and it was a time well spent.

_____________________________

The words of a man's mouth are as deep waters, and the well-spring of wisdom as a flowing brook. Proverbs 18:4
Post #: 37
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Science & Origins >> RE: Ken Ham
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI