Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Election 2008 >> Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies?
Jump to post #:
Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 9:24:02 AM   
TMeeks

 

Posts: 2131
Joined: 1/27/2007
Status: offline
The latest Obama ad just shows how desparately they fear losing the younger vote. One of it's charges against John McCain is that he admits "not knowing how to use a computer".

The HORRORS OF IT ALL! Imagine that! A president that may not sit up nights writing his own email or typing out his own letters! OH! THE HUMANITY!

I'm actually glad that Clinton also didn't appear to be able to operate a computer. Otherwise, he might have been up all night on internet porn sites run by the commies.

What the dems know is that at this point, if he is to be anywhere close to even at the time of the election, Obama needs to be up by 12+ points in the polls right now and they aren't.

Like I said earlier... sales of Depends in heavily democratic areas has GOT to be up. They are afraid. Very afraid. They are SO afraid that they are taking their cues for attack ads from MotherJones and Huffington.com

http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/03/7743_john_mccain_doe.html

Watch out Obama handlers! You have just insulted a HUGH number of people that could not care less about sitting for hours on end wasting time at Starbucks because of a WiFi addiction!

Just how stupid ARE Obama's handlers????

_____________________________

Galatians 6:7 Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. 8 The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.
Post #: 1
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 9:39:39 AM   
empyrealsymphony

 

Posts: 36
Joined: 9/10/2008
Status: offline
As an Obama supporter I think this was a weak attempt by Barack's team and they need to chill on the attacks. They are being told by the publica they need to strike back and IMHO Barack has always been above that and i hate to see him stoop down to the level of ordinary politicians. he is better than that.

However, I will say that the following statment from his campaign does make a good point:
quote:

"Our economy wouldn't survive without the Internet, and cyber-security continues to represent one our most serious national security threats," Pfeiffer said. "It's extraordinary that someone who wants to be our president and our commander in chief doesn't know how to send an e-mail."


TMeeks,
You are talking about national polls. Please remember the election is decided on state by state electoral votes.

Not all the post-convention polls are in yet, but for all the talk of McCain's post-convention "surge" (the way the media describes it, it's much more than a bounce) McCain's only gained 7 EVs in the last week (as of Sept. 10, actual leaners only). Even more telling, he's actually 31 EVs below where he was on Aug. 21, just a few days before the Democratic convention started. Since that same date, Obama has actually gained 17 EVs.
Post #: 2
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 10:08:36 AM   
rcjames


Posts: 5576
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
To the Harvard educated elitist, I guess that the citizenry (commoners) not knowing how to play with their latest toys is just unthinkable.

So while Obama is running around trying to find a connection to do a focus group and take a poll about a terrorist attack that just occured; McCain will have already made the proper decision and response.

Just exactly as happened over the invasion of Georgia.

Thanks
RC

_____________________________

Just a country Preacher's humble opinion

Read the first chapter of my latest book here;
http://www.deliveranceofsara.com
Post #: 3
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 10:12:23 AM   
rcjames


Posts: 5576
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: empyrealsymphony

As an Obama supporter I think this was a weak attempt by Barack's team and they need to chill on the attacks. They are being told by the publica they need to strike back and IMHO Barack has always been above that and i hate to see him stoop down to the level of ordinary politicians. he is better than that.


So sorry, but that ain't gonna happen, as they have announced that they are going to increase the attack ads to counter the drop in the polls.

Read about it HERE in the internation version of the NYT.

Thanks
RC

_____________________________

Just a country Preacher's humble opinion

Read the first chapter of my latest book here;
http://www.deliveranceofsara.com
Post #: 4
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 10:32:33 AM   
rlj


Posts: 2142
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: online
quote:

I'm actually glad that Clinton also didn't appear to be able to operate a computer. Otherwise, he might have been up all night on internet porn sites run by the commies.


I thought that pornography was a western imperialist capitalist perversion? ; )

quote:

Just exactly as happened over the invasion of Georgia.


RC we did nothing in Georgia but wait for the Russians to pull out and talk big afterward. I'm not sure I get what you mean on this one.

_____________________________

-Roger

This is who I'm voting for. He is from the same party I voted for last time. This is consistent with my belief in the failure of the two party system and my disgust with it.
http://www.baldwin08.com/#
Post #: 5
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 10:39:57 AM   
P31W

 

Posts: 2972
Joined: 6/13/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Barack has always been above that and i hate to see him stoop down to the level of ordinary politicians. he is better than that


What are you talking about? Did he or did he not join a racist black church and make his spiritural mentor Rev. Wright so that he could get elected to office?

One day I hear he joined because he wanted the vote....the next day I hear he does not act like a ordinary politician.....which is it?

Didn't he say one day he could not disown Rev. Wright and a few days later dismiss him?

Didn't he in 2003 try to pass legislation for manditory sex education to even elementary children requiring they learn about diseases you get from having sex and now try to claim it was "only" about good and bad touches?
Post #: 6
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 11:11:28 AM   
rcjames


Posts: 5576
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rlj
RC we did nothing in Georgia but wait for the Russians to pull out and talk big afterward. I'm not sure I get what you mean on this one.


Obama changed his position on the situation 4 times in four days (probably until his 300+ foriegn policy advisors came to a consensus).

McCain came out immediatly with his position, the same one that Obama got around to four days later.

I just think it will be the same on everything.

Obama stutters with his thinking just as he does with answering questions when he does not have a teleprompter to tell him what to say.

Thanks
RC

_____________________________

Just a country Preacher's humble opinion

Read the first chapter of my latest book here;
http://www.deliveranceofsara.com
Post #: 7
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 11:40:51 AM   
HighPlainsDrifter


Posts: 1292
Joined: 9/22/2005
From: The Great Sioux Empire
Status: offline
I've forgotten more about computers in the last 6 months than Obama will know in his lifetime, so apparently I should be leader of the free world.

_____________________________

Molon Labe
Post #: 8
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 2:21:10 PM   
rlj


Posts: 2142
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: online
So in the end on Georgia both candidates favor talking tough, blowing their own horn and talk of what needs to be done in Russia while the Russians still refuse to pull the troops out of the country fully and won't allow any observers into the regions.

We have as much business in Georgia as the Russians have in say the Bahamas.

_____________________________

-Roger

This is who I'm voting for. He is from the same party I voted for last time. This is consistent with my belief in the failure of the two party system and my disgust with it.
http://www.baldwin08.com/#
Post #: 9
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 2:26:42 PM   
HighPlainsDrifter


Posts: 1292
Joined: 9/22/2005
From: The Great Sioux Empire
Status: offline
quote:

We have as much business in Georgia as the Russians have in say the Bahamas.


Or Venezuela?

_____________________________

Molon Labe
Post #: 10
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 3:01:38 PM   
TMeeks

 

Posts: 2131
Joined: 1/27/2007
Status: offline
For the past two elections it's been all about THE POPULAR VOTE for the democrats and now, because the polls aren't going their way, it's about the Electoral vote????

By the way, not only am I aware of the importance of the Electoral College; but, I think it is the ONLY thing standing between the bulk of the United States and complete domination by a few large states. Nebraskans might as well forget about voting and stay home once the socialist powergrab takes away the Electoral College and replaces it with the 'popular vote'.

The only voting machines anybody will need will be in the big, liberal cities.

quote:

ORIGINAL: empyrealsymphony

As an Obama supporter I think this was a weak attempt by Barack's team and they need to chill on the attacks. They are being told by the publica they need to strike back and IMHO Barack has always been above that and i hate to see him stoop down to the level of ordinary politicians. he is better than that.

However, I will say that the following statment from his campaign does make a good point:
quote:

"Our economy wouldn't survive without the Internet, and cyber-security continues to represent one our most serious national security threats," Pfeiffer said. "It's extraordinary that someone who wants to be our president and our commander in chief doesn't know how to send an e-mail."


TMeeks,
You are talking about national polls. Please remember the election is decided on state by state electoral votes.

Not all the post-convention polls are in yet, but for all the talk of McCain's post-convention "surge" (the way the media describes it, it's much more than a bounce) McCain's only gained 7 EVs in the last week (as of Sept. 10, actual leaners only). Even more telling, he's actually 31 EVs below where he was on Aug. 21, just a few days before the Democratic convention started. Since that same date, Obama has actually gained 17 EVs.


_____________________________

Galatians 6:7 Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. 8 The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.
Post #: 11
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 3:08:48 PM   
letusreason


Posts: 807
Joined: 8/30/2008
Status: offline
Yes the add is definately aimed at the 18-24 yo guys in their mom's basement voting block.

How foolish to spend George Clooney's hard earned campain funds on a group that hardly ever votes anyways.

I understand why democrats are becoming frustrated with the way he is running his campaign.
Post #: 12
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 7:14:43 PM   
LivingParadox


Posts: 803
Joined: 2/28/2007
Status: offline
Oh My! What did the other Presidents in the past do without e-mail?

Truth it's better for a leader not to have e-mail as a strategy and communications come in writing and are communicated by staff, nothing new.

Also, as for as technology issue, he'll have people that know the ying-yang of everything technical, I don't think McCain has to prove he can hack into the CIA's network to prove he's a leader -- in fact, he might be the one to step back and REFORM some of the garbage coming across the internet.
Post #: 13
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 8:18:41 PM   
kimberlysfrog


Posts: 1599
Joined: 2/28/2005
From: Northern California
Status: offline
It would have been nice if Obama and his campaign had done some research:

quote:

From the Boston Globe (March 4, 2000):

McCain gets emotional at the mention of military families needing food stamps or veterans lacking health care. The outrage comes from inside: McCain's severe war injuries prevent him from combing his hair, typing on a keyboard, or tying his shoes.


and

quote:

Jacob Weisberg, in an article in Slate in 2000:

"Six months ago, no one would have pegged McCain as the most cybersavvy of this year's crop of candidates. At 63, he is the oldest of the bunch and because of his war injuries, he is limited in his ability to wield a keyboard."


_____________________________

Post #: 14
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 10:06:01 PM   
kimberlysfrog


Posts: 1599
Joined: 2/28/2005
From: Northern California
Status: offline
Yet another item to disprove Obama's latest ad:

From Forbes.com:

quote:

In certain ways, McCain was a natural Web candidate. Chairman of the Senate Telecommunications Subcommittee and regarded as the U.S. Senate's savviest technologist, McCain is an inveterate devotee of email. His nightly ritual is to read his email together with his wife, Cindy. The injuries he incurred as a Vietnam POW make it painful for McCain to type. Instead, he dictates responses that his wife types on a laptop. "She's a whiz on the keyboard, and I'm so laborious," McCain admits.


_____________________________

Post #: 15
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 10:14:44 PM   
TMeeks

 

Posts: 2131
Joined: 1/27/2007
Status: offline
Once again, the sly foxes at the Obama campaign have only outfoxed themselves!


quote:

ORIGINAL: kimberlysfrog

It would have been nice if Obama and his campaign had done some research:

quote:

From the Boston Globe (March 4, 2000):

McCain gets emotional at the mention of military families needing food stamps or veterans lacking health care. The outrage comes from inside: McCain's severe war injuries prevent him from combing his hair, typing on a keyboard, or tying his shoes.


and

quote:

Jacob Weisberg, in an article in Slate in 2000:

"Six months ago, no one would have pegged McCain as the most cybersavvy of this year's crop of candidates. At 63, he is the oldest of the bunch and because of his war injuries, he is limited in his ability to wield a keyboard."



_____________________________

Galatians 6:7 Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. 8 The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.
Post #: 16
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 10:27:04 PM   
inthysite


Posts: 770
Joined: 2/12/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Original empyrealsymphony
You are talking about national polls. Please remember the election is decided on state by state electoral votes.

Not all the post-convention polls are in yet, but for all the talk of McCain's post-convention "surge" (the way the media describes it, it's much more than a bounce) McCain's only gained 7 EVs in the last week (as of Sept. 10, actual leaners only). Even more telling, he's actually 31 EVs below where he was on Aug. 21, just a few days before the Democratic convention started. Since that same date, Obama has actually gained 17 EVs.


Actually according to realclearpolitics.com NObama and McCain are in a statistical tie concerning electoral votes:

Obama/Biden 217
157 Solid 60 Leaning

McCain/Palin 216
172 Solid 44 Leaning

Toss Up 105
RealClearPolitics Electoral College

And if you look at the state by state results it shows McCain picking up votes while NObama is losing ground. Quite the opposite of what you state.

< Message edited by inthysite -- 9/12/2008 10:33:57 PM >


_____________________________

Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart
Be acceptable in Thy sight, O LORD, my rock and my Redeemer - Psalm 19:14
Post #: 17
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/12/2008 10:40:55 PM   
colliefan

 

Posts: 2742
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: Raleigh, NC
Status: offline
This is guter politics along the lines of "If you elect a Republican, another black church will burn." And yes, both sides of the isle of been in the gutter.
Post #: 18
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/13/2008 12:33:40 AM   
ljmac

 

Posts: 1419
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
Where is the creator of the internet, energy hog Al Gore, when you need him?
Post #: 19
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/13/2008 10:46:04 AM   
rgsoundguy


Posts: 401
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: Pottstown, PA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: empyrealsymphony

As an Obama supporter I think this was a weak attempt by Barack's team and they need to chill on the attacks. They are being told by the publica they need to strike back and IMHO Barack has always been above that and i hate to see him stoop down to the level of ordinary politicians. he is better than that.

However, I will say that the following statment from his campaign does make a good point:
quote:

"Our economy wouldn't survive without the Internet, and cyber-security continues to represent one our most serious national security threats," Pfeiffer said. "It's extraordinary that someone who wants to be our president and our commander in chief doesn't know how to send an e-mail."


TMeeks,
You are talking about national polls. Please remember the election is decided on state by state electoral votes.

Not all the post-convention polls are in yet, but for all the talk of McCain's post-convention "surge" (the way the media describes it, it's much more than a bounce) McCain's only gained 7 EVs in the last week (as of Sept. 10, actual leaners only). Even more telling, he's actually 31 EVs below where he was on Aug. 21, just a few days before the Democratic convention started. Since that same date, Obama has actually gained 17 EVs.


Sad as it may seem, similar tactics worked in 1992. Clinton appeared on MTV and Arsenio Hall. George Bush did not. George Bush was accused of being out of touch for his failure to appear on such programs and you know who won that election.

_____________________________

Albert Einstein said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. That convinces me that our nation is insane because we continually elect republicans and democrats expecting change and get none.
Post #: 20
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/13/2008 10:54:26 AM   
LivingParadox


Posts: 803
Joined: 2/28/2007
Status: offline
Well we all know that everyone that knows how to use e-mail has the maturity and wisdom to lead

it's a moot point as pointed out previously it's more a logistic issue with McCain's physical limitations than a knowledge issue.
Post #: 21
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/13/2008 2:28:07 PM   
rcjames


Posts: 5576
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
I think it is just horrible that Obama would attack McCain because of his war injuries suffered with a POW.

He has problems using a key board because injuries sustained while he was defending the right of Obama to go to college and become something besides a beach bum and a drug dealer (which his best friend became).

That is the lowest of the low to attack someone over a disability, especially a veteran with a war disability.

What will Obama do next, remove the handicap parking spaces, overturn the disability act, or what.

Thanks
RC

_____________________________

Just a country Preacher's humble opinion

Read the first chapter of my latest book here;
http://www.deliveranceofsara.com
Post #: 22
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/13/2008 4:19:22 PM   
csl7037

 

Posts: 1629
Joined: 3/24/2008
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: kimberlysfrog

It would have been nice if Obama and his campaign had done some research:

quote:

From the Boston Globe (March 4, 2000):

McCain gets emotional at the mention of military families needing food stamps or veterans lacking health care. The outrage comes from inside: McCain's severe war injuries prevent him from combing his hair, typing on a keyboard, or tying his shoes.


and

quote:

Jacob Weisberg, in an article in Slate in 2000:

"Six months ago, no one would have pegged McCain as the most cybersavvy of this year's crop of candidates. At 63, he is the oldest of the bunch and because of his war injuries, he is limited in his ability to wield a keyboard."



quote:

ORIGINAL: kimberlysfrog

Yet another item to disprove Obama's latest ad:

From Forbes.com:

quote:

In certain ways, McCain was a natural Web candidate. Chairman of the Senate Telecommunications Subcommittee and regarded as the U.S. Senate's savviest technologist, McCain is an inveterate devotee of email. His nightly ritual is to read his email together with his wife, Cindy. The injuries he incurred as a Vietnam POW make it painful for McCain to type. Instead, he dictates responses that his wife types on a laptop. "She's a whiz on the keyboard, and I'm so laborious," McCain admits.




Oh my goodness!! Thanks, you guys for that info! I really didn't realize that! That's just rich! Absolutely infuriating, actually. People need to know this. Obama needs to pull this ad and APOLOGIZE immediately! Again, I say, it is unconscionable that we are running a hollow, empty man like Obama against a hero and true American like John McCain. Wow!

This is worse than Biden telling that state senator in a wheelchair to stand up. That was a gaffe, this is deliberate. After the way the McCain campaign over-reacted (IMO) to the lipstick on a pig comment, where are they on this one? This makes me MAD.

< Message edited by csl7037 -- 9/13/2008 4:37:49 PM >
Post #: 23
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/13/2008 5:49:26 PM   
iluvatar


Posts: 1934
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
Am I missing something? The video linked to in the OP is from Yahoo! not the OBama campaign and is posted on a blog. Has the link changed or is this the same one that was posted?

-Dan.

_____________________________

Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones.
Post #: 24
RE: Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies? - 9/13/2008 6:12:03 PM   
csl7037

 

Posts: 1629
Joined: 3/24/2008
Status: online
I actually never clicked on the link in the OP till now because I'd already seen the ad that Obama is running (it's at least running here in Florida). The video in the link is deplorable!! Mike Allen (politico.com) should've known better. Mocking him for saying he relies on his wife? What's next? Ask an amputee if he prefers Nike or Reebok? Disgusting.

But this article actually has the Obama ad.
Post #: 25
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Election 2008 >> Not being a WiFi addict disqualifies?
Jump to post #:
Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inb