RE: If Hillary was the nominee, would McCain have chosen a black VP?
View related threads:
(in this forum
| in all forums)
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login  | |
|
RE: If Hillary was the nominee, would McCain have chose... - 9/7/2008 10:02:48 AM
|
|
|
Thessa
Posts: 811
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: saved9201
Just wondering.
- Julius
Its not hard to guess where you are going with this...and the answer is no. He wouldnt have.
_____________________________
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
|
|
|
|
|
RE: If Hillary was the nominee, would McCain have chose... - 9/7/2008 2:49:10 PM
|
|
|
rlj
Posts: 2191
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
What you got this year will be deducted from your return next year. If it results in a negative payout, you will reimburse the government. It isn't a tax cut at all. It is a payment against future gains. It was meant to help the economy, not provide free money. We will all be accountable for what we received.
That is incorrect. This is from the IRS web site:
quote:
What is it? It's an economic stimulus payment that more than 124 million households will receive. It's not taxable, and it won't reduce your 2007 or 2008 refund or increase the amount you owe when you file your 2008 return. Payments started in May and will continue through the end of 2008.
http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=179211,00.html
The final form of the bill this was just free money for anyone who made over 3k a year from working, Social Security or Retirement. It has nothing to do with your taxes other than you must either work and file a return, be a spouse of someone and filing a joint return or get some kind of qualifying pension type money.
Under Clinton the child tax cut was a cut and it couldn't get you more money back then you paid. Bush and the Republicans made this a credit and Bush fought tooth and nail to make this permanent. All that happens is it comes up for vote at election time and no one is dumb enough to turn the tap off on a great big windfall of money for so many voters so they add little extensions to it instead. I think this is absurd and it means several thousand dollars a year for me at tax time but hey- if a Republican wants to give away free money to millions of people who didn't earn it and I'm getting a big fat piece of it they can call it whatever they want. ; ) It is not however a tax cut.
_____________________________
-Roger
This is who I'm voting for. He is from the same party I voted for last time. This is consistent with my belief in the failure of the two party system and my disgust with it.
http://www.baldwin08.com/#
|
|
|
|
|
RE: If Hillary was the nominee, would McCain have chose... - 9/7/2008 6:32:42 PM
|
|
|
todd_t
Posts: 1587
Joined: 6/21/2006
From: The North Woods
Status: offline
|
quote:
My answer would be no, primarily because, who would he choose?
Agreed. I think Lieberman would have been McCain's man. As is, he very nearly was before McCain's advisors talked him into choosing Palin at the last minute.
_____________________________
In Memoriam: 1st Sgt. Obediah Kolath, US Army, Died in Iraq War (1973-2005)
|
|
|
|
|
RE: If Hillary was the nominee, would McCain have chose... - 9/7/2008 7:34:20 PM
|
|
|
rcjames
Posts: 5677
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: todd_t
quote:
My answer would be no, primarily because, who would he choose?
Agreed. I think Lieberman would have been McCain's man. As is, he very nearly was before McCain's advisors talked him into choosing Palin at the last minute.
Liberman might have been good for national security, but McCain is fine in that are. Liberman would have been a dud with the base because of his abortion stance.
McCain will give it about a month or so and then say that he will appoint Liberman as Sec. of State. That will pull in the Jewish vote a lot of moderates and will not bother the pro-life base.
Thanks
RC
_____________________________
Just a country Preacher's humble opinion
Read the first chapter of my latest book here;
http://www.deliveranceofsara.com
|
|
|
|
|
RE: If Hillary was the nominee, would McCain have chose... - 9/7/2008 7:36:27 PM
|
|
|
SovereignIsHe
Posts: 5511
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rcjames
quote:
ORIGINAL: todd_t
quote:
My answer would be no, primarily because, who would he choose?
Agreed. I think Lieberman would have been McCain's man. As is, he very nearly was before McCain's advisors talked him into choosing Palin at the last minute.
Liberman might have been good for national security, but McCain is fine in that are. Liberman would have been a dud with the base because of his abortion stance.
McCain will give it about a month or so and then say that he will appoint Liberman as Sec. of State. That will pull in the Jewish vote a lot of moderates and will not bother the pro-life base.
Thanks
RC
Mr. Obama's stance on abortion is such that McCain could have probably got even Mr. Liberman past the right wing base of the Republican Party as the VP...
_____________________________
John
Proverbs 29:12 If a ruler hearken to lies, all his servants are wicked.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: If Hillary was the nominee, would McCain have chose... - 9/7/2008 8:07:07 PM
|
|
|
Rockwall
Posts: 432
Joined: 8/18/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bob_George
Probably. I don't think he saw anything in Palin except breasts. He wanted the non-partisan feminists who voted for Hillary to vote for Palin. Because being an older man he still thinks women have smaller brains than men and would be easily manipulated into voting for a strong conservative when the supported a strong liberal in the primaries. Not he case unfortunately for McCain.
Honestly George, straight answer please: since the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of black voters voted for Obama, do they have smaller brains too?
_____________________________
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely
|
|
|
|
|
RE: If Hillary was the nominee, would McCain have chose... - 9/7/2008 8:42:37 PM
|
|
|
Rockwall
Posts: 432
Joined: 8/18/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: saved9201
Back to the question.
My answer would be no, primarily because, who would he choose? There are none. Take out Powell and Rice, all you have left is J.C. Watts, who said he may vote for Obama, former Lt. Governor Michael Steele - maybe, and Alan Keyes (been there done that). All of the above would smell strongly of tokenism.
- Julius
What about Michael Steele? Well, some do not consider him black since some threw the symbolic oreo cookies (black on the outside, white on the inside) at him and also have called him an Uncle Tom. Michael Steele Youtube LINK
_____________________________
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely
|
|
|
|
|
RE: If Hillary was the nominee, would McCain have chose... - 9/7/2008 8:51:28 PM
|
|
|
iluvatar
Posts: 1968
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bob_George
If Hillary was the nominee I think McCain would've picked Jindall. He's not black but he's not white either.
Actually, I believe that from an anthropological/biological standpoint, east indians (maybe arabs, too, I forget) are grouped with caucasians. It has to do with similarities in bone structure, particularly in the face.
-Dan.
_____________________________
Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones.
|
|
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
 Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|
Forum Tools
Printable Version
