|
solomonsprayer -> RE: Palin Destroys McCain's Chance for Victory (9/1/2008 5:13:29 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jhud quote:
True, but Obama has more experience for sure. I don't know that Obama has a ton of experience to be President (....then again, they said that about Bill Clinton), but he'd be a great VP imo. .... I think all said, regardless of whether Obama is seen to have enough experience or not to be President, Palin's experience or lack thereof must stand on its own in analysis. Looking at her accomplishments so far, she does not stand out necessarily. That's why I asked if she were a man, would McCain and others take her on?.... I'm not saying Palin is bad!!!.....just an odd odd choice with little history/experience. I certainly think Palin is a daring choice - especially considering that most in this race are deep Washington insiders with which we have little hope for change in DC - but with his pick of Palin, McCain signals a desire for a completely new direction, and that is hopeful. Barack, depsite his historic nomination from a racial perspective, is little different than Edwards or Biden from the perspective of policy and the establishment - Palin instead brings the heart of America to DC, and that is experience is the sort one could never get from DC. Good analysis. I need to read up more on Palin. My post may have been completely knee-jerk reaction. I like how you lump Obama in with the other old-school Washington cats. ...He does a lot of smooth talking (like Bill Clinton) with little action that is radically different from the rest of D.C. In fact, when I read his thougths on policy, they are not different from many other Democrats (hardly distinguishable from Hillary's...in fact, Hillary had better policy solutions, IMO....she had both good moral philosophy - except for abortion/gay rights stuff - and good specific solutions...Obama had vague moral philosophy and impractical specific solutions.) I agree Palin is daring, but still a scary choice, considering McCain literally might die 1 second after election is done being so old. We still don't know enough about Palin. But also, supposing that McCain sincerely blieves in Palin, it still also has strategic value does it not? ..Getting women voters...white undecided.....and former Hillary disgruntled?.....and balances out himself (age, gender, background)? .... I just think for all it brings, it can also backfire majorly. That's the risk, despite whether Palin is a great candidate or not.
|
|
|
|