|
henny -> RE: Biden (8/25/2008 10:13:01 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: inthysite I find it strange that all of a sudden everyone is saying how good of an attack dog Biden will be, that NObama needs an attack dog. NObama is supposed to be about change, not the same old politics any more, he is s different politician. But he is showing himself to be the same old liberal as all the rest. I'd like to believe that one could win by taking the high road, but I don't think that's feasible. McCain was the first one to go negative (at least in terms of ads), so if Obama just tries to keep his nose clean and not effectively respond, he'd lose. Which is another reason why Biden is good, as Biden can go on the attack more aggressively, while Obama can focus on a more positive message (although, as I said before, "attacking" more aggressively has always been the role of the VP when campaigning). quote:
Plus I thought everyone was saying how good NObama was at attacking McCain. Now all of a sudden he needs an attack dog? Sounds like more spin to try and put a positive light on Biden. Who said Obama was good at attacking McCain? I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't think he's been very good at it at all. For a couple weeks after he returned from overseas his campaign kind of floundered in the face of McCain's attacks, and I think they had a hard time responding and grabbing attention back, so he suffered in the polls. They have been much better the past week or so when his campaign pounced on the McCain houses gaff, and effectively pushed that. I actually don't think that alone will hurt McCain much, but what it does do in Obama's advantage is that it pretty much muzzles the McCain camp from pursuing the "elitist" narrative further on Obama (which was so effective against Kerry last time around), as all Obama has to do is remind them of the house incident to shut them up. quote:
Again I find it strange that everyone was saying that McCain was running an ineffective campaign but apparently it was/is pretty effective. He managed to force the hand of NObama in his decision for VP. Rather than picking someone he wanted he was reduced to only 2 choices. Go McCain! His campaign wasn't effective, up until around July when he restructured things, bringing in member's of Bush's old team, and went negative in a big way following Obama's trip over seas. Now I actually think McCain is running a very effective campaign, it's not a pretty campaign, but it's exactly the sort of campaign that I think people respond to. But I don't think Obama's hand was forced in choosing Biden. It was pretty much assumed from the start that Obama would try to find someone with foreign policy experience as a VP, as that is his biggest week spot, and his Biden's name was being floated from the beginning. Choosing him makes more sense than anyone else I can think of.
|
|
|
|