|
Makrothumeo -> RE: Apologetic books (8/30/2008 4:09:56 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: iluvatar I think you'll find that most popular "apologists" write for those folks who are already Christian, convincing them of what they already believe. They may equip you to face very shallow challenges that may come up conversing with others who have a similarly shallow axe to grind against Christianity, but I wouldn't expect them to hold up against any more serious philosophical arguments. -Dan. I totally disagree. I take it you've never read Alvin Plantinga, Francis A. Schaeffer, Cornelius Van Til, John Frame, Gordon Clark, William Dembski, Michael Behe, Hugh Ross, G.K. Chesterton, Ravi Zacharias, Norman Geisler, Paul Copan, William Lane Craig, Craig Hazen, Augustine, Blaise Pascal, F.F. Bruce, Gary Habermas, Alister McGrath, Robert Bowman, Os Guinness, J.P. Moreland, Greg Koukl, B.B. Warfield, C.S. Lewis... just a few off the top of my head. If you really think these guys don't have any serious philosophical arguments then you're almost totally alone in thinking so. Alvin Plantinga for instance is considered one of the greatest philosophers who ever lived. Francis A. Schaeffer is definitely no push over, I suggest reading his trilogy, "The God Who Is There" "Escape From Reason" and "He Is There And He Is Not Silent". [edit: added the following] Of course these guys might not be "popular" to much of the "professing church" who prefers the ultra lite fluff the likes of Joel Osteen or Rick Warren but that's a whole other issue. These guys I mentioned above are all highly respected among Christians and non-Christians and many of them have done a number of public debates with Christian and non-Christian scholars. Just this week I watched the William Lane Craig vs. Peter Atkins debate on "What is the Evidence For/Against the Existence of God" and Douglas Geivett vs. Eddie Tabash debate on the existence of God. I've seen all of James White's debates and I have tickets to the James R. White vs. Bart Ehrman debate in January. You can find a number of other good debates, like Greg Bahnsen's, in various places on the web.
|
|
|
|