|
TaoPoohBear -> RE: Obama to invade Pakistan (7/17/2008 10:45:11 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WesP What percentage would it take to make a dirty bomb? If it is only 4%, would that hurt people? Can't find a % And it's been a long nite of work, so I need to get to bed! But - The Newsweek link said - "While yellowcake alone is not considered potent enough for a so-called "dirty bomb" — a conventional explosive that disperses radioactive material — it could stir widespread panic if incorporated in a blast". Wikipedia has this - quote:
In order for a terrorist organization to construct and detonate a dirty bomb, they must first acquire radioactive material either by stealing it or buying through legal or illegal channels. Possible RDD material could come from the millions of radioactive sources used worldwide in the industry, for medical purposes and in academic applications mainly for research. Of these sources, only nine reactor produced isotopes stand out as being suitable for radiological terror: americium-241, californium-252, caesium-137, cobalt-60, iridium-192, plutonium-238, polonium-210, radium-226 and strontium-90,[7] and even from these it is possible that radium-226 and polonium-210 do not pose a significant threat. By the way, from the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) - quote:
What are the main dangers of a dirty bomb? The main danger from a dirty bomb is from the explosion, which can cause serious injuries and property damage. The radioactive materials used in a dirty bomb would probably not create enough radiation exposure to cause immediate serious illness, except to those people who are very close to the blast site. However, the radioactive dust and smoke spread farther away could be dangerous to health if it is inhaled. So, the main danger from a bomb is explosion![:D] I think they waited until the 4th week (hand grenade training) in Basic Training in the Army to tell us that important stuff![:D]
|
|
|
|