|
lightshineon -> RE: Church plans to give away a semi-auto assault rifle during youth conference (7/14/2008 8:46:49 AM)
|
What I said was illegal, is a child cannot buy a gun until he is eighteen. What about background checks required by the law? My brother owned guns as a young boy. We now keep in the closet his collection, per request of the Secret Service, because he is Mentally Ill, and threatened the president of the Untied States five years ago. My brother as teenager was bullied very badly at school, he told me many time ( secretly) that he planned to take the gun to school, and blow his tormentors away. Thank Goodness, he never acted on it. I am sure Eric, and Dylans mom, and dad wish they would have known their sons better. Giving weapons to children is just plain stupid. It may have been acceptable in days past, but we live in a different world. How many of you hunt for your food every day. The only hunting we do is at the Super walmart. What libility would the church have if a troubled child won a gun went on a killing spree. We always here, where the guns came from even at Virginia Tech. I think the right to bear arms is important, and a necessary thing, but know who the heck, is getting a semi-automatic weapon. I cannot imagine giving a child a gun. I live in an area, that hunting is the norm, like I said we have twelve guns ( another forum). I jst would not give my children a gun if they are under eighteen. John, also please get over yourself for once. I did not call you stupid. I called no one person stupid, I said it is a stupid act, to give guns to children in church. The church can, and would be liable if an unfortunate event happened. On adults you can do background checks, you cannot on children. I guess it is ok to give a gun to a well skilled killer, ( because it is a contest) opposed to a killer that has to develop skills [8|] M, I agree that it make the church look bad, redneck if you will. I agree the bone spurs happened at a very good time for the judge. I guess sitting and judging would not be an option, and is he the only judge in the state of Oklahoma.
|
|
|
|