Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

No more prayer to Jesus in VA

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> No more prayer to Jesus in VA
Jump to post #:
Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/25/2008 10:29:50 PM   
freakofnature

 

Posts: 818
Joined: 1/17/2008
Status: offline
Now I know some of you are going to applaud the resignation of the 6 officers because of the whole imagined "separation of church and state/constitution" thing but me personally, I think I may write one of these officers in on my presidential ballot for actually leading with convictions:

Under Ban, 6 Troopers Resign as Chaplains
Post #: 1
RE: No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/25/2008 10:44:25 PM   
blessedinnyc

 

Posts: 1946
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freakofnature

Now I know some of you are going to applaud the resignation of the 6 officers because of the whole imagined "separation of church and state/constitution" thing but me personally, I think I may write one of these officers in on my presidential ballot for actually leading with convictions:

Under Ban, 6 Troopers Resign as Chaplains

I think this is probably the right move in light of the establishment clause. People who are seen as agents of the government should not be speaking in the context of a specific religion when they perform their duties.

Although I would like to see Jesus's name used everywhere, this move is consistent with the secular Deism that the founding fathers implied the US should generally keep to. We shouldn't try to have a government that represents Christ because the government, like all other worldly institutions, is under the influence of Satan.
Post #: 2
RE: No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/25/2008 11:02:21 PM   
ljmac

 

Posts: 1419
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
Democrats v. Jesus

Gov. Tim Kaine (D) and his censors are just doing what Democrats do naturally, fighting Jesus whenever they aren't up for election. Kaine is the so-called moderate that some thought might be nObama's VP pick. If he had, Jesus' name would still be permitted in Virginia.
Post #: 3
RE: No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/25/2008 11:44:47 PM   
michlang

 

Posts: 119
Joined: 5/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ljmac

Democrats v. Jesus

Gov. Tim Kaine (D) and his censors are just doing what Democrats do naturally, fighting Jesus whenever they aren't up for election. Kaine is the so-called moderate that some thought might be nObama's VP pick. If he had, Jesus' name would still be permitted in Virginia.


Did you read the article at all?? It was the police superintendent who issued the order, and it only applies to non-denominational or (I assume) inter-religious public, communal services. In private services or counseling it does not apply. Before you overreact and somehow jump to Obama, which has absolutely nothing to do with this thread, or before you make absolutely RIDICULOUS statements about democrats, please read the article in its entirely first. Thanks.

_____________________________

It may be the case that the preferred philosopher of Bush is Jesus, but it is far from likely that the preferred president of Jesus is a politician who improperly enlists him as an ally in wars against the fundamentalists of other religions.-S. Zabala
Post #: 4
RE: No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/26/2008 12:50:55 AM   
Jhud


Posts: 7875
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
quote:

Although I would like to see Jesus's name used everywhere, this move is consistent with the secular Deism that the founding fathers implied the US should generally keep to. We shouldn't try to have a government that represents Christ because the government, like all other worldly institutions, is under the influence of Satan.


'Secular Deism'. Are you familiar with the term oxymoron?

_____________________________

Jack

It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first..
- Ronald Reagan
Post #: 5
RE: No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/26/2008 10:01:59 AM   
letusreason


Posts: 801
Joined: 8/30/2008
Status: online
"Secular Deism"....is that anything like religious atheism or is that pantheism? Using contradictive terms can be confusing.
Post #: 6
RE: No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/26/2008 11:25:56 AM   
mapachito13

 

Posts: 2479
Joined: 10/1/2007
Status: offline
Christianity is being assaulted more from within by the self-righteous Pharisitiical right who claim "I am more Christian/ my denomination is more Christian because...."

They will know we are Christians by our love for each other (John 13:35) not by how many times we invoke His name in public "for all people to see". (Matthew 6:1-5)

BTW, if this country were founded as a "Christian" nation where is the name of Jesus in the founding legal documents?

Dec of Ind: mentions God and Creator (Deist maybe, but not implicitly Christian language)

Us Constitution: mentions religion (and not just the jewish or Christian variety) and not one mention of God, Creator, Jesus or any other reference to a Supreme Being.

So this nation was not founded as a Christian nation like so many Christians attest so vociferously!

_____________________________

Peace Sells....But Who's Buying!
"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is not someone hiding in a cave in Pakistan or Afghanistan, but our own fiscal irresponsibility."-David Walker, fmr comptroller general of the US
Post #: 7
RE: No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/26/2008 12:09:20 PM   
Dubya


Posts: 1033
Joined: 10/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
John Adams and John Hancock:
We Recognize No Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus! [April 18, 1775]

John Adams:
“ The general principles upon which the Fathers achieved independence were the general principals of Christianity… I will avow that I believed and now believe that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God.”

"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." --October 11, 1798

Samuel Adams: “ He who made all men hath made the truths necessary to human happiness obvious to all… Our forefathers opened the Bible to all.” [ "American Independence," August 1, 1776. Speech delivered at the State House in Philadelphia]

“ Let divines and philosophers, statesmen and patriots, unite their endeavors to renovate the age by impressing the minds of men with the importance of educating their little boys and girls, inculcating in the minds of youth the fear and love of the Deity… and leading them in the study and practice of the exalted virtues of the Christian system.” [October 4, 1790]

John Quincy Adams:
• “Why is it that, next to the birthday of the Savior of the world, your most joyous and most venerated festival returns on this day [the Fourth of July]?" “Is it not that, in the chain of human events, the birthday of the nation is indissolubly linked with the birthday of the Savior? That it forms a leading event in the progress of the Gospel dispensation? Is it not that the Declaration of Independence first organized the social compact on the foundation of the Redeemer's mission upon earth? That it laid the cornerstone of human government upon the first precepts of Christianity"?
--1837, at the age of 69, when he delivered a Fourth of July speech at Newburyport, Massachusetts.

In Benjamin Franklin's 1749 plan of education for public schools in Pennsylvania, he insisted that schools teach "the excellency of the Christian religion above all others, ancient or modern."

In 1787 when Franklin helped found Benjamin Franklin University, it was dedicated as "a nursery of religion and learning, built on Christ, the Cornerstone."

Alexander Hamilton:
• Hamilton began work with the Rev. James Bayard to form the Christian Constitutional Society to help spread over the world the two things which Hamilton said made America great:
(1) Christianity
(2) a Constitution formed under Christianity.
“The Christian Constitutional Society, its object is first: The support of the Christian religion. Second: The support of the United States.”

On July 12, 1804 at his death, Hamilton said, “I have a tender reliance on the mercy of the Almighty, through the merits of the Lord Jesus Christ. I am a sinner. I look to Him for mercy; pray for me.”

"For my own part, I sincerely esteem it [the Constitution] a system which without the finger of God, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests." [1787 after the Constitutional Convention]

Patrick Henry:
“It cannot be emphasized too clearly and too often that this nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religion, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason, peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.” [May 1765 Speech to the House of Burgesses]

Samuel Johnston:
“It is apprehended that Jews, Mahometans (Muslims), pagans, etc., may be elected to high offices under the government of the United States. Those who are Mahometans, or any others who are not professors of the Christian religion, can never be elected to the office of President or other high office, [unless] first the people of America lay aside the Christian religion altogether, it may happen. Should this unfortunately take place, the people will choose such men as think as they do themselves.
[Elliot’s Debates, Vol. IV, pp 198-199, Governor Samuel Johnston, July 30, 1788 at the North Carolina Ratifying Convention]

quote:

ORIGINAL: mapachito13
So this nation was not founded as a Christian nation like so many Christians attest so vociferously!

Yeah, right!!
Post #: 8
RE: No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/26/2008 1:34:37 PM   
cow451


Posts: 3933
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: freakofnature

Now I know some of you are going to applaud the resignation of the 6 officers because of the whole imagined "separation of church and state/constitution" thing but me personally, I think I may write one of these officers in on my presidential ballot for actually leading with convictions:

Under Ban, 6 Troopers Resign as Chaplains


If they were teaching them how to observe Shemini Atzeret, you'd be less impressed with their convictions.

_____________________________

Wenn Sie so intelligent sind, warum Sie hier sind?
Post #: 9
Republicans ignoring first amendment. - 9/26/2008 1:58:58 PM   
blessedinnyc

 

Posts: 1946
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ljmac

Democrats v. Jesus

Gov. Tim Kaine (D) and his censors are just doing what Democrats do naturally, fighting Jesus whenever they aren't up for election. Kaine is the so-called moderate that some thought might be nObama's VP pick. If he had, Jesus' name would still be permitted in Virginia.

Republicans v. First Amendment

Gov. Tim Kaine is doing what Democrats do naturally, keeping their promise when they swear to uphold the constitution.

quote:

John Adams and John Hancock:
We Recognize No Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus! [April 18, 1775]

I notice, Dubya, that among others, you leave out Jefferson. Is there a reason you are dodging the fact that Jefferson wrote the Congressional Koran? Would you like police chaplains praying the peace of Allah upon families?

quote:

Patrick Henry:
“It cannot be emphasized too clearly and too often that this nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religion, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason, peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.” [May 1765 Speech to the House of Burgesses]

Dubya, I hope you weren't involved in the "FDR got on the television back in 1929" thread, because I think Henry was referring to England. Note that Henry was also a Deist; George Bush calls Islam a peaceful religion, sometimes- that doesn't mean he supports us becoming a Muslim country.

quote:

“ He who made all men hath made the truths necessary to human happiness obvious to all… Our forefathers opened the Bible to all.”

Adams later clarified how he felt about the US and religion in his 1796 treaty with Tripoli:

quote:

As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion- as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility of Mohametans... it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony between the two countries.


quote:

In Benjamin Franklin's 1749 plan of education for public schools in Pennsylvania, he insisted that schools teach "the excellency of the Christian religion above all others, ancient or modern."

Ben was a well-known Deist:

quote:

"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason."
-Poor Richard's Almanac

quote:

"In the affairs of the world, men are saved, not by faith, but by the lack of it."

quote:

"When a religion is good, I conceive it will support itself; and when it does not support itself so that its professors are obliged to call for the help of the civil power, 'tis a sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one."

quote:

"If we look back into history for the character of the present sects in Christianity, we shall find few that have not in their turns been persecutors, and complainers of persecution. The primitive Christians thought persecution extremely wrong in the Pagans, but practiced it on one another. The first Protestants of the Church of England blamed persecution in the Romish Church, but practiced it upon the Puritans. They found it wrong in Bishops, but fell into the practice themselves both here (England) and in New England

It is interesting to note that of all of Franklin's public writings around the time of the revolution, they all seemed to argue in favor of a secular government.


As damning as some of these statements are, perhaps the strongest come from the obvious gaps in important people:

James Madison
quote:

"Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise."
-letter to Wm. Bradford, 1774

quote:

"The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood for centuries."
-1803 letter objecting use of gov. land for churches

quote:

"It may not be easy, in every possible case, to trace the line of separation between the rights of religion and the Civil authority with such distinctness as to avoid collisions and doubts on unessential points. The tendency to unsurpastion on one side or the other, or to a corrupting coalition or alliance between them, will be best guarded agst. by an entire abstinence of the Gov't from interfence in any way whatsoever, beyond the necessity of preserving public order, and protecting each sect agst. trespasses on its legal rights by others."
James Madison, "James Madison on Religious Liberty",

quote:

"Experience witnesseth that ecclesiastical establishments, instead of maintaining the purity and efficacy of religion, have had a contrary operation. During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What has been its fruits? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution."
- "A Memorial and Remonstrance", 1785


George Washington
Paul F. Boller states in is anthology on Washington: "There is no mention of Jesus Christ anywhere in his extensive correspondence." [Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1963, pp. 14-15]
quote:

Religious controversies are always productive of more acrimony and irreconcilable hatreds than those which spring from any other cause. Of all the animosities which have existed among mankind, those which are caused by the difference of sentiments in religion appear to be the most inveterate and distressing, and ought most to be depreciated.
-letter to Edward Newenham


Thomas Paine
quote:

"Of all the tyrannies that affect mankind, tyranny in religion is the worst."

quote:

What is it the New Testament teaches us? To believe that the Almighty committed debauchery with a woman engaged to be married; and the belief of this debauchery is called faith

quote:

We do not admit the authority of the church with respect to its pretended infallibility, its manufactured miracles, its setting itself up to forgive sins. It was by propagating that belief and supporting it with fire that she kept up her temporal power

quote:

All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.


Thomas Jefferson
quote:

In every country and every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot ... they have perverted the purest religion ever preached to man into mystery and jargon, unintelligible to all mankind, and therefore the safer engine for their purpose.

quote:

Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned; yet we have not advanced an inch towards uniformity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half the world fools, and the other half hypocrites. To support roguery and error all over the earth

quote:

They [preachers] dread the advance of science as witches do the approach of daylight and scowl on the fatal harbinger announcing the subversions of the duperies on which they live.

quote:

"No man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever."
-Virginia Act for Religious Freedom

quote:

"Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the Common Law."
-letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, 1814


So in other words, the many founding fathers the dominionists conveniently ignore (and the others that they misconstrue) ultimately decided to put the establishment clause into the constitution. It may go too far to kick God out of the public square, but it certainly isn't ridiculous to have the view that separation of Church and State means the police chaplain probably shouldn't do too much evangelizing as part of his official duties.

< Message edited by blessedinnyc -- 9/26/2008 2:25:31 PM >
Post #: 10
RE: Republicans ignoring first amendment. - 9/26/2008 2:22:06 PM   
Dubya


Posts: 1033
Joined: 10/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc

quote:

ORIGINAL: ljmac

Democrats v. Jesus

Gov. Tim Kaine (D) and his censors are just doing what Democrats do naturally, fighting Jesus whenever they aren't up for election. Kaine is the so-called moderate that some thought might be nObama's VP pick. If he had, Jesus' name would still be permitted in Virginia.

Republicans v. First Amendment

Gov. Tim Kaine is doing what Democrats do naturally, keeping their promise when they swear to uphold the constitution.

quote:

John Adams and John Hancock:
We Recognize No Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus! [April 18, 1775]

I notice, Dubya, that among others, you leave out Jefferson. Is there a reason you are dodging the fact that Jefferson wrote the Congressional Koran? Would you like police chaplains praying the peace of Allah upon families?

The comment made was to the "Founding Fathers" - I didn't know I had to quote ALL of them!

But here are some from the pen of Thomas Jefferson:

“ The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend to all the happiness of man.”

“Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern which have come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of Jesus.”

"I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus."

“God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever.” (excerpts are inscribed on the walls of the Jefferson Memorial in the nations capital) [Source: Merrill . D. Peterson, ed., Jefferson Writings, (New York: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc., 1984), Vol. IV, p. 289. From Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia, Query XVIII, 1781.]
Post #: 11
RE: Republicans ignoring first amendment. - 9/26/2008 2:30:31 PM   
blessedinnyc

 

Posts: 1946
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dubya
But here are some from the pen of Thomas Jefferson:

“ The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend to all the happiness of man.”

Hmmm. Then he goes on to say:

quote:

But compare with these the demoralizing dogmas of Calvin.
1. That there are three Gods.
2. That good works, or the love of our neighbor, is nothing.
3. That faith is every thing, and the more incomprehensible the proposition, the more merit the faith.
4. That reason in religion is of unlawful use.
5. That God, from the beginning, elected certain individuals to be saved, and certain others to be damned; and that no crimes of the former can damn them; no virtues of the latter save."
- to Benjamin Waterhouse, Jun. 26, 1822



quote:

"I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus."

Then he also says:
quote:

"It is not to be understood that I am with him (Jesus Christ) in his doctrines. I am a Materialist; he takes the side of Spiritualism, he preaches the efficacy of repentance toward forgiveness of sin; I require a counterpoise of good works to redeem it." - to Carey, 1816


And then, of course, let me remind you of the quote I posted above, earlier:

quote:

"Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the Common Law."
-letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, 1814


That, along with the mountain of damning evidence I posted above, suggests that his faith has little to do with the Christianity taught by Wesley, Calvin, Luther, St. Francis, Augustine, or any of the early church fathers. Regardless of how Jefferson feels about Jesus, he was not a Christian and did not support "priests of superstition" acting on behalf of the government:

quote:

The priests of the superstition, a bloodthirsty race, are as cruel and remorseless as the being whom they represented as the family God of Abraham, of Isaac and of Jacob, and the local God of Israel.
Post #: 12
RE: Republicans ignoring first amendment. - 9/26/2008 2:38:46 PM   
Dubya


Posts: 1033
Joined: 10/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc
That, along with the mountain of damning evidence I posted above, suggests that his faith has little to do with the Christianity taught by Wesley, Calvin, Luther, St. Francis, Augustine, or any of the early church fathers. It also suggests that he is turning over in his grave at the thought of police chaplains propogandizing Jesus as part of their official duties.

Oh, I doubt that.

Jefferson was a man who gave much thought to philosophy, spirituality, and morality. Just because he did not agree with many of the Reformers does not mean that our country was not founded on the principles of Christianity. Rather than looking at what he disagreed with, look at what he supported and how he said it influenced his writings and beliefs.

Also, you said in post # 2 that the "Founding Fathers" were secular Deists. I gave a number of quotes which demonstrate that to be questionable at the least.
Post #: 13
RE: Republicans ignoring first amendment. - 9/26/2008 3:00:07 PM   
Dubya


Posts: 1033
Joined: 10/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc
quote:

"Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the Common Law."
-letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, 1814


You might want to read the entire letter in context rather than taking something from an atheist website.

Jefferson's letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, from Monticello, February 10, 1814.

For we know that the common law is that system of law which was introduced by the Saxons on their settlement in England, and altered from time to time by proper legislative authority from that time to the date of Magna Charta, which terminates the period of the common law, or lex non scripta, and commences that of the statute law, or Lex Scripta. This settlement took place about the middle of the fifth century. But Christianity was not introduced till the seventh century; the conversion of the first christian king of the Heptarchy having taken place about the year 598, and that of the last about 686. Here, then, was a space of two hundred years, during which the common law was in existence, and Christianity no part of it.

He was NOT talking about the U.S., the Constitution, or anything pertaining to that. The argument was concerning British lawyers who argued that Christianity was part of British COmmon Law. Jefferson shows in this letter that could not be true since common law pre-dated Christianity in England.

Atheists frequently take things out of context to prove a point. It shows very poor scholarship in my opinion.
Post #: 14
RE: Republicans ignoring first amendment. - 9/26/2008 3:07:53 PM   
blessedinnyc

 

Posts: 1946
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dubya
Oh, I doubt that.

Jefferson was a man who gave much thought to philosophy, spirituality, and morality. Just because Jefferson was a Universalist, not a Christian does not mean that our country was not founded on the principles of Christianity. Rather than looking at what he disagreed with, look at what he supported and how he said it influenced his writings and beliefs.

I think there's two arguments that you made originally in this post Dubya; one is that Jefferson was a Christian. The other is that Jefferson not being a Christian doesn't mean that the nation wasn't founded on the principles of Christianity; I think the second argument is a bit more interesting, so I am going to respond to the above quote with minor changes on my part (italicized).

It's absolutely correct that the country was founded on some Christian values, but it was also very heavily influenced by Humanist values (Erasmus, Locke) Greek values (Plato and the Athenians), and of course, Jewish values. Some of the Humanists were "Christians", and I'm sure that the Dominionists will also try to argue that Socrates and Plato were also Christians (go figure.) However, even if there was some Christian influence to the country, it certainly wasn't of the fundamentalist kind that would have blocked the establishment clause.
Post #: 15
RE: Republicans ignoring first amendment. - 9/26/2008 3:13:37 PM   
blessedinnyc

 

Posts: 1946
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dubya

quote:

ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc
quote:

"Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the Common Law."
-letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, 1814


You might want to read the entire letter in context rather than taking something from an atheist website.

Jefferson's letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, from Monticello, February 10, 1814.

For we know that the common law is that system of law which was introduced by the Saxons on their settlement in England, and altered from time to time by proper legislative authority from that time to the date of Magna Charta, which terminates the period of the common law, or lex non scripta, and commences that of the statute law, or Lex Scripta. This settlement took place about the middle of the fifth century. But Christianity was not introduced till the seventh century; the conversion of the first christian king of the Heptarchy having taken place about the year 598, and that of the last about 686. Here, then, was a space of two hundred years, during which the common law was in existence, and Christianity no part of it.

He was NOT talking about the U.S., the Constitution, or anything pertaining to that. The argument was concerning British lawyers who argued that Christianity was part of British COmmon Law. Jefferson shows in this letter that could not be true since common law pre-dated Christianity in England.

Atheists frequently take things out of context to prove a point. It shows very poor scholarship in my opinion.

Hang on here. Didn't your quote above ("The doctrines of Jesus are simple and tend to the happiness of man.") leave out the whole complaint about organized religion less than a sentence later?

Meanwhile, the context you cite still doesn't change the meaning: the common law that was partly used to make up the constitution existed before Christianity, and thus, government does not require religion to operate.
Post #: 16
RE: Republicans ignoring first amendment. - 9/26/2008 3:18:27 PM   
Dubya


Posts: 1033
Joined: 10/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dubya
Oh, I doubt that.

Jefferson was a man who gave much thought to philosophy, spirituality, and morality. Just because Jefferson was a Universalist, not a Christian does not mean that our country was not founded on the principles of Christianity. Rather than looking at what he disagreed with, look at what he supported and how he said it influenced his writings and beliefs.

I think there's two arguments that you made originally in this post Dubya; one is that Jefferson was a Christian. The other is that Jefferson not being a Christian doesn't mean that the nation wasn't founded on the principles of Christianity; I think the second argument is a bit more interesting, so I am going to respond to the above quote with minor changes on my part (italicized).

It's absolutely correct that the country was founded on some Christian values, but it was also very heavily influenced by Humanist values (Erasmus, Locke) Greek values (Plato and the Athenians), and of course, Jewish values. Some of the Humanists were "Christians", and I'm sure that the Dominionists will also try to argue that Socrates and Plato were also Christians (go figure.) However, even if there was some Christian influence to the country, it certainly wasn't of the fundamentalist kind that would have blocked the establishment clause.

One point I would like to correct regarding theology. I have read that Jefferson was a Unitarian... that is NOT the same as a Universalist, although today they are combined as "Unitarian-Universalist" - they were NOT combined in Jefferson's day.

Unitarians do not accept the doctrine of the Trinity. God is One and only One - not three in one.
Universalists believe that everyone goes to heaven, that there is no eternal punishment, or some combination of the two.

It has been argued in many places that ALL or MOST of the Founding Fathers were Deists and not Christians and therefore our country was not founded on Christian principles. The quotes I gave above attempted to show otherwise. Although many would say Unitarians are not Christians, I'm not so sure they would agree. Jefferson may not have been what we would call a mainstream Christian, many, if not most, of the Founding Fathers were.
Post #: 17
RE: Republicans ignoring first amendment. - 9/26/2008 3:19:02 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7875
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
I think the artguments here are getting off track.

Even if one agrees some of the Founding Fathers were Deists, this doesn't mean they were irreligous or secularists; indeed by today's standards they would be very religious people. And none of them would have suggested that a chaplain, of which there were plenty at the time, adopt an artifically ecumenical phrasing to his prayers - Kaine is wrong here.

_____________________________

Jack

It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first..
- Ronald Reagan
Post #: 18
RE: Republicans ignoring first amendment. - 9/26/2008 3:27:51 PM   
Dubya


Posts: 1033
Joined: 10/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dubya

quote:

ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc
quote:

"Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the Common Law."
-letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, 1814


You might want to read the entire letter in context rather than taking something from an atheist website.

Jefferson's letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, from Monticello, February 10, 1814.

For we know that the common law is that system of law which was introduced by the Saxons on their settlement in England, and altered from time to time by proper legislative authority from that time to the date of Magna Charta, which terminates the period of the common law, or lex non scripta, and commences that of the statute law, or Lex Scripta. This settlement took place about the middle of the fifth century. But Christianity was not introduced till the seventh century; the conversion of the first christian king of the Heptarchy having taken place about the year 598, and that of the last about 686. Here, then, was a space of two hundred years, during which the common law was in existence, and Christianity no part of it.

He was NOT talking about the U.S., the Constitution, or anything pertaining to that. The argument was concerning British lawyers who argued that Christianity was part of British COmmon Law. Jefferson shows in this letter that could not be true since common law pre-dated Christianity in England.

Atheists frequently take things out of context to prove a point. It shows very poor scholarship in my opinion.

Hang on here. Didn't your quote above ("The doctrines of Jesus are simple and tend to the happiness of man.") leave out the whole complaint about organized religion less than a sentence later?

But there is a differnece between Jefferson finding the doctrines of Jesus to be simple and the way organized religion tends to complicate matters. Clearly, from Jefferson's writings, he was disturbed with the way organized religion tended to lead to strife and even violence. He had no problem with Jesus.
quote:


Meanwhile, the context you cite still doesn't change the meaning: the common law that was partly used to make up the constitution existed before Christianity, and thus, government does not require religion to operate.

I think you are making a leap in your logic here.

Several quotes can be listed which shows the influence of religion, and Christianity in particular, on the Constitution. Very little, if anything, of the Constitution (other than the Bill of Rights) can be traced to common law.
Post #: 19
RE: No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/27/2008 3:28:42 AM   
ljmac

 

Posts: 1419
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michlang

quote:

ORIGINAL: ljmac

Democrats v. Jesus

Gov. Tim Kaine (D) and his censors are just doing what Democrats do naturally, fighting Jesus whenever they aren't up for election. Kaine is the so-called moderate that some thought might be nObama's VP pick. If he had, Jesus' name would still be permitted in Virginia.


Did you read the article at all?? It was the police superintendent who issued the order, and it only applies to non-denominational or (I assume) inter-religious public, communal services. In private services or counseling it does not apply. Before you overreact and somehow jump to Obama, which has absolutely nothing to do with this thread, or before you make absolutely RIDICULOUS statements about democrats, please read the article in its entirely first. Thanks.


Oh great, Democrats will permit you to say Jesus' name if you get their permission. If you say Dear Jesus, they want to stop you. If you say F Jesus, they want to defend you.

This is just normal behavior for Democrats. They see a cross, they want to destroy it. They see the 10 Commandments, they want to ban it. They see a child pray in the wrong place, they want to shut her up. They see someone pray to Jesus too close to one of their places of worship, an abortuary, and they want them arrested.

Kaine stands firmly behind the prohibition of Jesus' name.
Post #: 20
RE: No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/27/2008 8:53:16 AM   
fiat_lux

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 5/21/2005
From: Ottawa
Status: offline
quote:

Oh great, Democrats will permit you to say Jesus' name if you get their permission. If you say Dear Jesus, they want to stop you. If you say F Jesus, they want to defend you.

This is just normal behavior for Democrats. They see a cross, they want to destroy it. They see the 10 Commandments, they want to ban it. They see a child pray in the wrong place, they want to shut her up. They see someone pray to Jesus too close to one of their places of worship, an abortuary, and they want them arrested.

Do you actually personally know many Democrats? The reality might disappoint you.
Post #: 21
RE: Republicans ignoring first amendment. - 9/27/2008 12:16:55 PM   
blessedinnyc

 

Posts: 1946
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

I think the artguments here are getting off track.

Even if one agrees some of the Founding Fathers were Deists, this doesn't mean they were irreligous or secularists; indeed by today's standards they would be very religious people. And none of them would have suggested that a chaplain, of which there were plenty at the time, adopt an artifically ecumenical phrasing to his prayers - Kaine is wrong here.

Actually, Jack, to go further here, many of them would have argued against state sponsored chaplains in the first place. Here's what Madison had to say when he opposed the office of the congressional chaplain:

quote:


"Is the appointment of Chaplains to the two Houses of Congress consistent with the Constitution, and with the pure principle of religious freedom? In strictness the answer on both points must be in the negative. The Constitution of the U.S. forbids everything like an establishment of a national religion. The law appointing Chaplains establishes a religious worship for the national representatives, to be performed by Ministers of religion, elected by a majority of them; and these are to be paid out of the national taxes. Does not this involve the principle of a national
establishment, applicable to a provision for a religious worship for the Constituent as well as of the representative Body, approved by the majority, and conducted by Ministers of religion paid by the entire nation."
-Detached Memoranda


It's clear at the very least that not only would Madison oppose state-sponsored Chaplains using the word Jesus; he'd oppose state-sponsored Chaplains in the first place.
Post #: 22
RE: No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/27/2008 12:21:39 PM   
blessedinnyc

 

Posts: 1946
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL:
Kaine stands firmly behind the prohibition of Jesus' name.

You mean he stands firmly behind the establishment clause?

If he is a Christian- or even a man of his word, he doesn't have much choice in this regard. He took an oath to uphold the constitution.
Post #: 23
RE: No more prayer to Jesus in VA - 9/27/2008 3:07:48 PM   
Jhud